Literature DB >> 22491349

Measurement of cellular chemotaxis with ECIS/Taxis.

Kathryn M Pietrosimone1, Xiuyin Yin, David A Knecht, Michael A Lynes.   

Abstract

Cellular movement in response to external stimuli is fundamental to many cellular processes including wound healing, inflammation and the response to infection. A common method to measure chemotaxis is the Boyden chamber assay, in which cells and chemoattractant are separated by a porous membrane. As cells migrate through the membrane toward the chemoattractant, they adhere to the underside of the membrane, or fall into the underlying media, and are subsequently stained and visually counted (1). In this method, cells are exposed to a steep and transient chemoattractant gradient, which is thought to be a poor representation of gradients found in tissues (2). Another assay system, the under-agarose chemotaxis assay, (3, 4) measures cell movement across a solid substrate in a thin aqueous film that forms under the agarose layer. The gradient that develops in the agarose is shallow and is thought to be an appropriate representation of naturally occurring gradients. Chemotaxis can be evaluated by microscopic imaging of the distance traveled. Both the Boyden chamber assay and the under-agarose assay are usually configured as endpoint assays. The automated ECIS/Taxis system combines the under-agarose approach with Electric Cell-substrate Impedance Sensing (ECIS) (5, 6). In this assay, target electrodes are located in each of 8 chambers. A large counter-electrode runs through each of the 8 chambers (Figure 2). Each chamber is filled with agarose and two small wells are the cut in the agarose on either side of the target electrode. One well is filled with the test cell population, while the other holds the sources of diffusing chemoattractant (Figure 3). Current passed through the system can be used to determine the change in resistance that occurs as cells pass over the target electrode. Cells on the target electrode increase the resistance of the system (6). In addition, rapid fluctuations in the resistance represent changes in the interactions of cells with the electrode surface and are indicative of ongoing cellular shape changes. The ECIS/Taxis system can measure movement of the cell population in real-time over extended periods of time, but is also sensitive enough to detect the arrival of a single cell at the target electrode. Dictyostelium discoidium is known to migrate in the presence of a folate gradient (7, 8) and its chemotactic response can be accurately measured by ECIS/Taxis (9). Leukocyte chemotaxis, in response to SDF1α and to chemotaxis antagonists has also been measured with ECIS/Taxis (10, 11). An example of the leukocyte response to SDF1α is shown in Figure 1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22491349      PMCID: PMC3460541          DOI: 10.3791/3840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  15 in total

1.  Chemotaxis under agarose: a new and simple method for measuring chemotaxis and spontaneous migration of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes and monocytes.

Authors:  R D Nelson; P G Quie; R L Simmons
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Cross-linking of actin filaments by myosin II is a major contributor to cortical integrity and cell motility in restrictive environments.

Authors:  Gary Laevsky; David A Knecht
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Assessment of chemokinetic behavior of inflammatory lung macrophages in a linear under-agarose assay.

Authors:  D K Newton-Nash; P Tonellato; M Swiersz; P Abramoff
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.962

4.  Mechanisms of amoeboid chemotaxis: an evaluation of the cortical expansion model.

Authors:  J Condeelis; A Bresnick; M Demma; S Dharmawardhane; R Eddy; A L Hall; R Sauterer; V Warren
Journal:  Dev Genet       Date:  1990

5.  Integrating conflicting chemotactic signals. The role of memory in leukocyte navigation.

Authors:  E F Foxman; E J Kunkel; E C Butcher
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Concentration gradients of chemotactic factors in chemotaxis assays.

Authors:  D A Lauffenburger; R T Tranquillo; S H Zigmond
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Monitoring fibroblast behavior in tissue culture with an applied electric field.

Authors:  I Giaever; C R Keese
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Use of electric cell-substrate impedance sensing to assess in vitro cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Daniel Opp; Brian Wafula; Jennifer Lim; Eric Huang; Jun-Chih Lo; Chun-Min Lo
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 10.618

9.  Induction of MCP-1 expression in airway epithelial cells: role of CCR2 receptor in airway epithelial injury.

Authors:  Matthew C Lundien; Kamal A Mohammed; Najmunnisa Nasreen; R S Tepper; Joyce A Hardwick; Kerry L Sanders; Robert D Van Horn; Veena B Antony
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.317

10.  An intracellular signaling hierarchy determines direction of migration in opposing chemotactic gradients.

Authors:  Bryan Heit; Samantha Tavener; Eko Raharjo; Paul Kubes
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  5 in total

1.  Real-time monitoring of cell protrusion dynamics by impedance responses.

Authors:  Paolo Armando Gagliardi; Alberto Puliafito; Laura di Blasio; Federica Chianale; Desiana Somale; Giorgio Seano; Federico Bussolino; Luca Primo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Value of phagocyte function screening for immunotoxicity of nanoparticles in vivo.

Authors:  Eleonore Fröhlich
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-05-26

3.  Use of Single-Frequency Impedance Spectroscopy to Characterize the Growth Dynamics of Biofilm Formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Jozef B J H van Duuren; Mathias Müsken; Bianka Karge; Jürgen Tomasch; Christoph Wittmann; Susanne Häussler; Mark Brönstrup
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  In silico analysis and in planta production of recombinant ccl21/IL1β protein and characterization of its in vitro anti-tumor and immunogenic activity.

Authors:  Hasan Marashi; Maria Beihaghi; Masoud Chaboksavar; Samad Khaksar; Homan Tehrani; Ardavan Abiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing for the quantification of endothelial proliferation, barrier function, and motility.

Authors:  Robert Szulcek; Harm Jan Bogaard; Geerten P van Nieuw Amerongen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 1.355

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.