J G M Rosmalen1, E H Bos, P de Jonge. 1. Interdisciplinary Center for Psychiatric Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. j.g.m.rosmalen@umcg.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stress questionnaires are included in many epidemiological cohort studies but the psychometric characteristics of these questionnaires are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to describe these characteristics for two short questionnaires measuring the lifetime and past year occurrence of stress: the List of Threatening Events (LTE) as a measure of acute stress and the Long-term Difficulties Inventory (LDI) as a measure of chronic stress. METHOD: This study was performed in a general population cohort consisting of 588 females (53.7%) and 506 males (46.3%), with a mean age of 53.5 years (s.d.=11.3 years). Respondents completed the LTE and the LDI for the past year, and for the age categories of 0-12, 13-18, 19-39, 40-60, and >60 years. They also completed questionnaires on perceived stress, psychological distress (the General Health Questionnaire, GHQ-12), anxiety and depression (the Symptom Checklist, SCL-8) and neuroticism (the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire - Revised Short Scale, EPQ-RSS-N). Approximately 2 years later, 976 respondents (89%) completed these questionnaires for a second time. RESULTS: The stability of the retrospective reporting of long-term difficulties and life events was satisfactory: 0.7 for the lifetime LDI and 0.6 for the lifetime LTE scores. The construct validity of these lists is indicated by their positive associations with psychological distress, mental health problems and neuroticism. CONCLUSIONS: This study in a large population-based sample shows that the LDI and LTE have sufficient validity and stability to include them in major epidemiological cohort studies.
BACKGROUND: Stress questionnaires are included in many epidemiological cohort studies but the psychometric characteristics of these questionnaires are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to describe these characteristics for two short questionnaires measuring the lifetime and past year occurrence of stress: the List of Threatening Events (LTE) as a measure of acute stress and the Long-term Difficulties Inventory (LDI) as a measure of chronic stress. METHOD: This study was performed in a general population cohort consisting of 588 females (53.7%) and 506 males (46.3%), with a mean age of 53.5 years (s.d.=11.3 years). Respondents completed the LTE and the LDI for the past year, and for the age categories of 0-12, 13-18, 19-39, 40-60, and >60 years. They also completed questionnaires on perceived stress, psychological distress (the General Health Questionnaire, GHQ-12), anxiety and depression (the Symptom Checklist, SCL-8) and neuroticism (the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire - Revised Short Scale, EPQ-RSS-N). Approximately 2 years later, 976 respondents (89%) completed these questionnaires for a second time. RESULTS: The stability of the retrospective reporting of long-term difficulties and life events was satisfactory: 0.7 for the lifetime LDI and 0.6 for the lifetime LTE scores. The construct validity of these lists is indicated by their positive associations with psychological distress, mental health problems and neuroticism. CONCLUSIONS: This study in a large population-based sample shows that the LDI and LTE have sufficient validity and stability to include them in major epidemiological cohort studies.
Authors: Clarissa Baratin; Erik Beune; Daan van Schalkwijk; Karlijn Meeks; Liam Smeeth; Juliet Addo; Ama de-Graft Aikins; Ellis Owusu-Dabo; Silver Bahendeka; Frank P Mockenhaupt; Ina Danquah; Matthias B Schulze; Joachim Spranger; Daniel Boateng; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; Karien Stronks; Charles Agyemang Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Raphael Baffour Awuah; Ama de-Graft Aikins; F Nii-Amoo Dodoo; Karlijn Ac Meeks; Eric Jaj Beune; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; Juliet Addo; Liam Smeeth; Silver K Bahendeka; Charles Agyemang Journal: J Health Psychol Date: 2020-10-20
Authors: Sanne H Booij; Marieke Wichers; Peter de Jonge; Sjoerd Sytema; Jim van Os; Lex Wunderink; Johanna T W Wigman Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-01-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Raphael M Herr; Amira Barrech; Natalie Riedel; Harald Gündel; Peter Angerer; Jian Li Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Bart Klijs; Eva U B Kibele; Lea Ellwardt; Marij Zuidersma; Ronald P Stolk; Rafael P M Wittek; Carlos M Mendes de Leon; Nynke Smidt Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne; Victoria O'Callaghan; Nicholas G Martin; Ian B Hickie; Nathan A Gillespie; Richard Parker; Natalie Mills; Katherine M Kirk; Jan Scott; Anna Vinkhuyzen; Daniel F Hermens; Penelope A Lind; Tracey A Davenport; Jane M Burns; Melissa Connell; Brendan P Zietsch; James Scott; Margaret J Wright; Sarah E Medland; John McGrath Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-03-17 Impact factor: 2.692