Literature DB >> 22490924

No fear, no panic: probing negation as a means for emotion regulation.

Cornelia Herbert1, Roland Deutsch, Petra Platte, Paul Pauli.   

Abstract

This electroencephalographic study investigated if negating one's emotion results in paradoxical effects or leads to effective emotional downregulation. Healthy participants were asked to downregulate their emotions to happy and fearful faces by using negated emotional cue words (e.g., no fun, no fear). Cue words were congruent with the emotion depicted in the face and presented prior to each face. Stimuli were presented in blocks of happy and fearful faces. Blocks of passive stimulus viewing served as control condition. Active regulation reduced amplitudes of early event-related brain potentials (early posterior negativity, but not N170) and the late positive potential for fearful faces. A fronto-central negativity peaking at about 250 ms after target face onset showed larger amplitude modulations during downregulation of fearful and happy faces. Behaviorally, negating was more associated with reappraisal than with suppression. Our results suggest that in an emotional context, negation processing could be quite effective for emotional downregulation but that its effects depend on the type of the negated emotion (pleasant vs unpleasant). Results are discussed in the context of dual process models of cognition and emotion regulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  emotion regulation; event-related brain potentials; negation; reappraisal; suppression

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22490924      PMCID: PMC3739910          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nss043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  35 in total

1.  Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

Authors:  James J Gross; Oliver P John
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

2.  Fleeting images: rapid affect discrimination in the visual cortex.

Authors:  Markus Junghöfer; Dean Sabatinelli; Margaret M Bradley; Harald T Schupp; Thomas R Elbert; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Attending to affect: appraisal strategies modulate the electrocortical response to arousing pictures.

Authors:  Greg Hajcak; Jason S Moser; Robert F Simons
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2006-08

4.  Reappraisal modulates the electrocortical response to unpleasant pictures.

Authors:  Greg Hajcak; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Deconstructing reappraisal: descriptions preceding arousing pictures modulate the subsequent neural response.

Authors:  Dan Foti; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The suppression of exciting thoughts.

Authors:  D M Wegner; J W Shortt; A W Blake; M S Page
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-03

7.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.

Authors:  M M Bradley; P J Lang
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03

8.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-04

9.  Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition.

Authors:  M Eimer
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  The face-specific N170 component is modulated by emotional facial expression.

Authors:  Vera C Blau; Urs Maurer; Nim Tottenham; Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.759

View more
  9 in total

1.  Bodily Reactions to Emotional Words Referring to Own versus Other People's Emotions.

Authors:  Patrick P Weis; Cornelia Herbert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-22

2.  10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?

Authors:  Arthur M Jacobs; Melissa L-H Võ; Benny B Briesemeister; Markus Conrad; Markus J Hofmann; Lars Kuchinke; Jana Lüdtke; Mario Braun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-03

3.  Your emotion or mine: labeling feelings alters emotional face perception-an ERP study on automatic and intentional affect labeling.

Authors:  Cornelia Herbert; Anca Sfärlea; Terry Blumenthal
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Negative evaluation bias for positive self-referential information in borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Dorina Winter; Cornelia Herbert; Katrin Koplin; Christian Schmahl; Martin Bohus; Stefanie Lis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Characteristics of the regulation of the surprise emotion.

Authors:  Chuanlin Zhu; Ping Li; Zhao Zhang; Dianzhi Liu; Wenbo Luo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Emotion regulation strategies differentially modulate neural activity across affective prediction stages: An HD-EEG investigation.

Authors:  Fiorella Del Popolo Cristaldi; Giovanni Mento; Giulia Buodo; Michela Sarlo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Fearful contextual expression impairs the encoding and recognition of target faces: an ERP study.

Authors:  Huiyan Lin; Claudia Schulz; Thomas Straube
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Cognitive tasks during expectation affect the congruency ERP effects to facial expressions.

Authors:  Huiyan Lin; Claudia Schulz; Thomas Straube
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Better Not to Know? Emotion Regulation Fails to Benefit from Affective Cueing.

Authors:  Siwei Liu; Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt; Juan Zhou; Annett Schirmer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.