Literature DB >> 22490875

Immunosuppressive regimen and interstitial fibrosis and tubules atrophy at 12 months postrenal transplant.

Mariëlle A C J Gelens1, Floor M E G Steegh, Johannes P van Hooff, Robert Jan van Suylen, Frederikus H M Nieman, Lodewijk W E van Heurn, Carine J Peutz-Kootstra, Maarten H L Christiaans.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic renal transplant dysfunction is histopathologically characterized by interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. This study investigated the relative contribution of baseline donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics to interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy score at month 12 after renal transplantation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This retrospective study includes all 109 consecutive recipients with adequate implantation and month 12 biopsies transplanted between April of 2003 and February of 2007. Immunosuppression regimen was tacrolimus and steroids (10 days) plus either sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil.
RESULTS: Average interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy score increased from 0.70 to 1.65 (P<0.001). In an adjusted multiple linear regression analysis, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy score at month 12 was significantly related to donor type (donors after cardiac death versus living donor had interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy score+0.41, 95% confidence interval=0.05-0.76, P=0.02), baseline interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and immunosuppression regimen. Because of interaction between the latter two variables (P=0.002), results are given separately: recipients with a baseline interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy score of zero had a 0.60 higher score at month 12 (95% confidence interval=0.09-1.10, P=0.02) when mycophenolate mofetil-treated, whereas recipients with a baseline interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy score more than zero had a 0.38 higher score at month 12 (95% confidence interval=0.01-0.74, P=0.04) when sirolimus-treated. A higher score at month 12 correlated with a lower estimated GFR (ρ=-0.45, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that histologic assessment of a preimplantation biopsy may guide choice of immunosuppresion to maximize transplant survival and its interaction with type of immunosuppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22490875     DOI: 10.2215/CJN.09030911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  4 in total

1.  Progression of Interstitial Fibrosis in Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Rainer Oberbauer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Allograft rejection and tubulointerstitial fibrosis in human kidney allografts: interrogation by urinary cell mRNA profiling.

Authors:  Thangamani Muthukumar; John R Lee; Darshana M Dadhania; Ruchuang Ding; Vijay K Sharma; Joseph E Schwartz; Manikkam Suthanthiran
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.943

3.  Computer-assisted evaluation enhances the quantification of interstitial fibrosis in renal implantation biopsies, measures differences between frozen and paraffin sections, and predicts delayed graft function.

Authors:  Mladen Pavlovic; Andre Oszwald; Željko Kikić; Maja Carina Nackenhorst; Renate Kain; Nicolas Kozakowski
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.393

4.  Effect of mycophenolate mofetil on progression of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy after kidney transplantation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Karlo Mihovilović; Bojana Maksimović; Branislav Kocman; Denis Guštin; Zeljko Vidas; Stela Bulimbašić; Danica Galešić Ljubanović; Mirjana Sabljar Matovinović; Mladen Knotek
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.