BACKGROUND: Survival data for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims initially in PEA or asystole who convert to a shockable rhythm during attempted resuscitation, relative to an initial shockable rhythm, have never been previously reported. This study was done to assess OHCA outcomes among a large cohort of adults in the CARES dataset stratified by three rhythm categories: initial shockable (IS), converted shockable (CS), and never shockable (NS). METHODS: The study was IRB approved. All adult index events at participating sites (2005-2010) were study eligible. All patient data elements were provided. Odds ratios of CS and NS status for survival to hospital discharge were calculated via multivariate logistic regression that adjusted for demographics, site, resuscitation initiators, AED use, and other covariates. RESULTS: There were 40,274 OHCA records submitted to the CARES registry during the study period. After exclusions, our final sample size was 30,939 (7404 IS [23.9%], 3225 CS [10.4%], 20,310 NS [65.7%]). Raw survival rates of CS and NS patients were similar (4.7% vs. 4.1%, respectively; p=0.08) but significantly lower than IS patients (26.9%; p<0.001). The adjusted OR of survival to hospital discharge for CS was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.14, 0.20) and for NS it was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.15, 0.18) with IS as the referent. CONCLUSION: After OHCA, the survival rate for CS victims is significantly lower than for IS patients. These findings suggest that CS and IS are different entities and that alternatives to existing resuscitation algorithm tailored to patients with CS should be investigated.
BACKGROUND: Survival data for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims initially in PEA or asystole who convert to a shockable rhythm during attempted resuscitation, relative to an initial shockable rhythm, have never been previously reported. This study was done to assess OHCA outcomes among a large cohort of adults in the CARES dataset stratified by three rhythm categories: initial shockable (IS), converted shockable (CS), and never shockable (NS). METHODS: The study was IRB approved. All adult index events at participating sites (2005-2010) were study eligible. All patient data elements were provided. Odds ratios of CS and NS status for survival to hospital discharge were calculated via multivariate logistic regression that adjusted for demographics, site, resuscitation initiators, AED use, and other covariates. RESULTS: There were 40,274 OHCA records submitted to the CARES registry during the study period. After exclusions, our final sample size was 30,939 (7404 IS [23.9%], 3225 CS [10.4%], 20,310 NS [65.7%]). Raw survival rates of CS and NSpatients were similar (4.7% vs. 4.1%, respectively; p=0.08) but significantly lower than IS patients (26.9%; p<0.001). The adjusted OR of survival to hospital discharge for CS was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.14, 0.20) and for NS it was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.15, 0.18) with IS as the referent. CONCLUSION: After OHCA, the survival rate for CS victims is significantly lower than for IS patients. These findings suggest that CS and IS are different entities and that alternatives to existing resuscitation algorithm tailored to patients with CS should be investigated.
Authors: Michael Huntgeburth; Christoph Adler; Stephan Rosenkranz; Carsten Zobel; Walter F Haupt; Christian Dohmen; Hannes Reuter Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: C Adler; C Paul; J Hinkelbein; G Michels; R Pfister; A Krings; A Lechleuthner; R Stangl Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Hyuk Jun Yang; Gi Woon Kim; Hyun Kim; Jin Seong Cho; Tai Ho Rho; Han Deok Yoon; Mi Jin Lee Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Sini Saarinen; Ari Salo; James Boyd; Päivi Laukkanen-Nevala; Catharina Silfvast; Ilkka Virkkunen; Tom Silfvast Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Dong Eun Lee; Mi Jin Lee; Jae Yun Ahn; Hyun Wook Ryoo; Jungbae Park; Won Young Kim; Sang Do Shin; Sung Oh Hwang Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Dong Hun Lee; Byung Kook Lee; Yong Hwan Kim; Yoo Seok Park; Min Seob Sim; Su Jin Kim; Sang Hoon Oh; Dong Hoon Lee; Youn Jung Kim; Won Young Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 2.153