Literature DB >> 22490445

Genes with bimodal expression are robust diagnostic targets that define distinct subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer with different overall survival.

Dawn N Kernagis1, Allison H S Hall, Michael B Datto.   

Abstract

In some cancer types, certain genes behave as molecular switches, with on and off expression states. These genes tend to define tumor subtypes associated with different treatments and different patient survival. We hypothesized that clinically relevant molecular switch genes exist in epithelial ovarian cancer. To test this hypothesis, we applied a bimodal discovery algorithm to a publicly available ovarian cancer expression microarray data set, GSE9891 [285 tumors: 246 malignant serous (MS), 20 endometrioid (EM), and 18 low malignant potential (LMP) ovarian carcinomas]. Genes with robust bimodal expression patterns were identified across all ovarian tumor types and also within selected subtypes: 73 bimodal genes demonstrated differential expression between LMP versus MS and EM; 22 bimodal genes distinguished MS from EM; and 14 genes had significant association with survival among MS tumors. When these genes were combined into a single survival score, the median survival for patients with a favorable versus unfavorable score was 65 versus 29 months (P < 0.0001, hazard ratio = 0.4221). Two independent data sets [high-grade, advanced-stage serous (n = 53) and advanced-stage (n = 119) ovarian tumors] validated the survival score performance. We conclude that genes with bimodal expression patterns not only define clinically relevant molecular subtypes of ovarian carcinoma but also provide ideal targets for translation into the clinical laboratory.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22490445     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  8 in total

1.  Molecular biomarkers of residual disease after surgical debulking of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Susan L Tucker; Kshipra Gharpure; Shelley M Herbrich; Anna K Unruh; Alpa M Nick; Erin K Crane; Robert L Coleman; Jamie Guenthoer; Heather J Dalton; Sherry Y Wu; Rajesha Rupaimoole; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Bulent Ozpolat; Cristina Ivan; Wei Hu; Keith A Baggerly; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Genome-wide cross-cancer analysis illustrates the critical role of bimodal miRNA in patient survival and drug responses to PI3K inhibitors.

Authors:  Laura Moody; Guanying Bianca Xu; Yuan-Xiang Pan; Hong Chen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis identifies MEGF10 as a novel epigenetically repressed candidate tumor suppressor gene in neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Jessica Charlet; Ayumi Tomari; Anthony R Dallosso; Marianna Szemes; Martina Kaselova; Thomas J Curry; Bader Almutairi; Heather C Etchevers; Carmel McConville; Karim T A Malik; Keith W Brown
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.784

4.  Novel Model for Comprehensive Assessment of Robust Prognostic Gene Signature in Ovarian Cancer Across Different Independent Datasets.

Authors:  Zhitong Bing; Yuxiang Yao; Jie Xiong; Jinhui Tian; Xiangqian Guo; Xiuxia Li; Jingyun Zhang; Xiue Shi; Yanying Zhang; Kehu Yang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  The shape of gene expression distributions matter: how incorporating distribution shape improves the interpretation of cancer transcriptomic data.

Authors:  Laurence de Torrenté; Samuel Zimmerman; Masako Suzuki; Maximilian Christopeit; John M Greally; Jessica C Mar
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Comparative meta-analysis of prognostic gene signatures for late-stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Levi Waldron; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Aedín C Culhane; Markus Riester; Jie Ding; Xin Victoria Wang; Mahnaz Ahmadifar; Svitlana Tyekucheva; Christoph Bernau; Thomas Risch; Benjamin Frederick Ganzfried; Curtis Huttenhower; Michael Birrer; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 11.816

7.  Correlation of gene expression and associated mutation profiles of APOBEC3A, APOBEC3B, REV1, UNG, and FHIT with chemosensitivity of cancer cell lines to drug treatment.

Authors:  Suleyman Vural; Richard Simon; Julia Krushkal
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.639

8.  Whole transcriptome signature for prognostic prediction (WTSPP): application of whole transcriptome signature for prognostic prediction in cancer.

Authors:  Evelien Schaafsma; Yanding Zhao; Yue Wang; Frederick S Varn; Kenneth Zhu; Huan Yang; Chao Cheng
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 5.662

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.