Literature DB >> 22490228

Derivation and validation of clinical prediction rules for reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

J H Han1, W B Bilker, P H Edelstein, K B Mascitti, E Lautenbach.   

Abstract

Reduced vancomycin susceptibility (RVS) may lead to poor clinical outcomes in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. We conducted a cohort study of 392 patients with S. aureus bacteraemia within a university health system. The association between RVS, as defined by both Etest [vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >1·0 μg/ml] and broth microdilution (vancomycin MIC ≥1·0 μg/ml), and patient and clinical variables were evaluated to create separate predictive models for RVS. In total, 134 (34·2%) and 73 (18·6%) patients had S. aureus isolates with RVS by Etest and broth microdilution, respectively. The final model for RVS by Etest included methicillin resistance [odds ratio (OR) 1·51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·97-2·34], non-white race (OR 0·67, 95% CI 0·42-1·07), healthcare-associated infection (OR 0·56, 95% CI 0·32-0·96), and receipt of any antimicrobial therapy ≤30 days prior to the culture date (OR 3·06, 95% CI 1·72-5·44). The final model for RVS by broth microdilution included methicillin resistance (OR 2·45, 95% CI 1·42-4·24), admission through the emergency department (OR 0·54, 95% CI 0·32-0·92), presence of an intravascular device (OR 2·24, 95% CI 1·30-3·86), and malignancy (OR 0·51, 95% CI 0·26-1·00). The availability of an easy and rapid clinical prediction rule for early identification of RVS can be used to help guide the timely and individualized management of these serious infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22490228      PMCID: PMC3518568          DOI: 10.1017/S0950268812000295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   2.451


  35 in total

1.  Paradoxical relationship between the clinical outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and the minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin.

Authors:  James Price; Stephen Atkinson; Martin Llewelyn; John Paul
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Antibiotic choice may not explain poorer outcomes in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations.

Authors:  Natasha E Holmes; John D Turnidge; Wendy J Munckhof; James O Robinson; Tony M Korman; Matthew V N O'Sullivan; Tara L Anderson; Sally A Roberts; Wei Gao; Keryn J Christiansen; Geoffrey W Coombs; Paul D R Johnson; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Rising incidence of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and susceptibility to antibiotics: a global analysis 2004-2009.

Authors:  Stephen P Hawser; Samuel K Bouchillon; Daryl J Hoban; Michael Dowzicky; Tim Babinchak
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 5.283

4.  Daptomycin versus vancomycin for bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration: a case-control study.

Authors:  Carol L Moore; Paola Osaki-Kiyan; Nadia Z Haque; Mary Beth Perri; Susan Donabedian; Marcus J Zervos
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Underestimation of vancomycin and teicoplanin MICs by broth microdilution leads to underdetection of glycopeptide-intermediate isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Pierre Vaudaux; Elzbieta Huggler; Louis Bernard; Tristan Ferry; Adriana Renzoni; Daniel P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Impact of vancomycin exposure on outcomes in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: support for consensus guidelines suggested targets.

Authors:  Ravina Kullar; Susan L Davis; Donald P Levine; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Predicting high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Andrew S Lubin; David R Snydman; Robin Ruthazer; Pralhad Bide; Yoav Golan
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 8.  Importance of appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Galia Kariv; Elad Goldberg; Maria Raskin; Hila Shaked; Rawi Hazzan; Zmira Samra; Dina Paghis; Jihad Bishara; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Nine-hospital study comparing broth microdilution and Etest method results for vancomycin and daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Helio S Sader; Paul R Rhomberg; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  High vancomycin MIC and complicated methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Jose Maria Aguado; Rafael San-Juan; Antonio Lalueza; Francisca Sanz; Joaquin Rodríguez-Otero; Carmen Gómez-Gonzalez; Fernando Chaves
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of storage on vancomycin and daptomycin MIC in susceptible blood isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Franziska Ludwig; Becky Edwards; Timothy Lawes; Ian M Gould
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.948

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.