Literature DB >> 22490101

A predictive and construct validity study of a high-stakes objective clinical examination for assessing the clinical competence of international medical graduates.

Andrea Vallevand1, Claudio Violato.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive and construct validity of a high-stakes objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) used to select candidates for a 3-month clinical rotation to assess practice-readiness status.
SUMMARY: Analyses were undertaken to establish the reliability and validity of the OSCE. The generalizability coefficient (Ep(2)) for the assessment scores (checklist, global, and total) were all high, ranging from 0.73 to 0.84. Two discriminant analyses (promotion to the 3-month rotation and pass/fail status on the rotation) provided evidence of predictive validity with a 100% correct classification rate in the pass/fail rotation results. Factor analysis results provided evidence of construct validity with four factors identified: Clinical Skills, Internal Medicine, General Medical Knowledge, and Counseling. The known group differences between licensing status and residency experience also provided evidence of construct validity.
CONCLUSIONS: The results are encouraging for the predictive and construct validity of the OSCE as an assessment of clinical competence.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22490101     DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2012.664988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teach Learn Med        ISSN: 1040-1334            Impact factor:   2.414


  5 in total

Review 1.  What Do We Know and Not Know about the Professional Integration of International Medical Graduates (IMGs) in Canada?

Authors:  Elena Neiterman; Ivy Lynn Bourgeault; Christine L Covell
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2017-05

2.  Power of the policy: how the announcement of high-stakes clinical examination altered OSCE implementation at institutional level.

Authors:  Chi-Wei Lin; Tsuen-Chiuan Tsai; Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Der-Fang Chen; Keh-Min Liu
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Reliability analysis of the objective structured clinical examination using generalizability theory.

Authors:  Juan Andrés Trejo-Mejía; Melchor Sánchez-Mendiola; Ignacio Méndez-Ramírez; Adrián Martínez-González
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-08-18

4.  The influence of students' prior clinical skills and context characteristics on mini-CEX scores in clerkships--a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Anja Rogausch; Christine Beyeler; Stephanie Montagne; Patrick Jucker-Kupper; Christoph Berendonk; Sören Huwendiek; Armin Gemperli; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Borderline grades in high stakes clinical examinations: resolving examiner uncertainty.

Authors:  Boaz Shulruf; Barbara-Ann Adelstein; Arvin Damodaran; Peter Harris; Sean Kennedy; Anthony O'Sullivan; Silas Taylor
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.