Literature DB >> 22489541

Confronting deep uncertainties in risk analysis.

Louis Anthony Cox1.   

Abstract

How can risk analysts help to improve policy and decision making when the correct probabilistic relation between alternative acts and their probable consequences is unknown? This practical challenge of risk management with model uncertainty arises in problems from preparing for climate change to managing emerging diseases to operating complex and hazardous facilities safely. We review constructive methods for robust and adaptive risk analysis under deep uncertainty. These methods are not yet as familiar to many risk analysts as older statistical and model-based methods, such as the paradigm of identifying a single "best-fitting" model and performing sensitivity analyses for its conclusions. They provide genuine breakthroughs for improving predictions and decisions when the correct model is highly uncertain. We demonstrate their potential by summarizing a variety of practical risk management applications.
© 2012 Society for Risk Analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22489541     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01792.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  6 in total

1.  Testing for ontological errors in probabilistic forecasting models of natural systems.

Authors:  Warner Marzocchi; Thomas H Jordan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Insidious trends and social/environmental justice: public health's challenge for responding to hazard events.

Authors:  Michael R Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Towards a New Framework for Addressing Structural Uncertainty in Health Technology Assessment Guidelines.

Authors:  Salah Ghabri; Irina Cleemput; Jean-Michel Josselin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Null Hypothesis Testing ≠ Scientific Inference: A Critique of the Shaky Premise at the Heart of the Science and Values Debate, and a Defense of Value-Neutral Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Brian H MacGillivray
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis.

Authors:  Dimitrios Gouglas; Kevin Marsh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Handling Uncertainty in Models of Seismic and Postseismic Hazards: Toward Robust Methods and Resilient Societies.

Authors:  Brian H MacGillivray
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.000

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.