BACKGROUND: Honey bees are important pollinators of both crops and wild plants. Pesticide regimes that threaten their sustainability should therefore be assessed. As an example, evidence that the agricultural use of neonicotinoid pesticides is a cause of the recently observed declines in honey bees is examined. The aim is to define exacting demographic conditions for a detrimental factor to precipitate a population decline, and Hill's epidemiological 'causality criteria' are employed as a structured process for making an expert judgement about the proposition that trace dietary neonicotinoids in nectar and pollen cause population declines in honey bees. RESULTS: In spite of the absence of decisive experimental results, the analysis shows that, while the proposition is a substantially justified conjecture in the context of current knowledge, it is also substantially contraindicated by a wide variety of circumstantial epidemiological evidence. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that dietary neonicotinoids cannot be implicated in honey bee declines, but this position is provisional because important gaps remain in current knowledge. Avenues for further investigations to resolve this longstanding uncertainty are therefore identified.
BACKGROUND:Honey bees are important pollinators of both crops and wild plants. Pesticide regimes that threaten their sustainability should therefore be assessed. As an example, evidence that the agricultural use of neonicotinoid pesticides is a cause of the recently observed declines in honey bees is examined. The aim is to define exacting demographic conditions for a detrimental factor to precipitate a population decline, and Hill's epidemiological 'causality criteria' are employed as a structured process for making an expert judgement about the proposition that trace dietary neonicotinoids in nectar and pollen cause population declines in honey bees. RESULTS: In spite of the absence of decisive experimental results, the analysis shows that, while the proposition is a substantially justified conjecture in the context of current knowledge, it is also substantially contraindicated by a wide variety of circumstantial epidemiological evidence. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that dietary neonicotinoids cannot be implicated in honey bee declines, but this position is provisional because important gaps remain in current knowledge. Avenues for further investigations to resolve this longstanding uncertainty are therefore identified.
Authors: Da Xiao; Jing Zhao; Xiaojun Guo; Hongying Chen; Mengmeng Qu; Weigang Zhai; Nicolas Desneux; Antonio Biondi; Fan Zhang; Su Wang Journal: Ecotoxicology Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Gennaro Di Prisco; Valeria Cavaliere; Desiderato Annoscia; Paola Varricchio; Emilio Caprio; Francesco Nazzi; Giuseppe Gargiulo; Francesco Pennacchio Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-10-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: G E Budge; D Garthwaite; A Crowe; N D Boatman; K S Delaplane; M A Brown; H H Thygesen; S Pietravalle Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Kamila Derecka; Martin J Blythe; Sunir Malla; Diane P Genereux; Alessandro Guffanti; Paolo Pavan; Anna Moles; Charles Snart; Thomas Ryder; Catharine A Ortori; David A Barrett; Eugene Schuster; Reinhard Stöger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 3.240