Literature DB >> 22488782

Toxicity of crude oil chemically dispersed in a wave tank to embryos of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus).

Colleen D Greer1, Peter V Hodson, Zhengkai Li, Thomas King, Kenneth Lee.   

Abstract

Tests of crude oil toxicity to fish are often chronic, exposing embryos from fertilization to hatch to oil solutions prepared using standard mixing procedures. However, during oil spills, fish are not often exposed for long periods and the dynamic nature of the ocean is not easily replicated in the lab. Our objective was to determine if brief exposures of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) embryos to dispersed oil prepared by standard mixing procedures was as toxic as oil dispersed in a more realistic model system. Embryos were first exposed to chemically dispersed Alaska North Slope crude and Arabian light crude oil for 2.4 h to 14 d from fertilization to determine if exposure time affected toxicity. Toxicity increased with exposure time, but 2.4-h exposures at realistic concentrations of oil induced blue-sac disease and reduced the percentage of normal embryos at hatch; there was little difference in toxicity between the two oils. Secondly, oil was chemically dispersed in a wave tank to determine if the resultant oil solutions were as toxic to herring embryos as laboratory-derived dispersed oil using a single exposure period of 24 h. Samples taken 15 min postdispersion were more toxic than laboratory-prepared solutions, but samples taken at 5, 30, and 60 min postdispersion were less toxic. Overall, the laboratory- and wave tank-derived solutions of dispersed oil provided similar estimates of toxicity despite differences in the methods for preparing test solutions, suggesting that laboratory and wave tank data are a reliable basis for ecological risk assessments of spilled oil.
Copyright © 2012 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22488782     DOI: 10.1002/etc.1828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  5 in total

1.  Effectiveness and potential ecological effects of offshore surface dispersant use during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: a retrospective analysis of monitoring data.

Authors:  Adriana C Bejarano; Edwin Levine; Alan J Mearns
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Ingestion and sublethal effects of physically and chemically dispersed crude oil on marine planktonic copepods.

Authors:  Rodrigo Almeda; Sarah Baca; Cammie Hyatt; Edward J Buskey
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Interactions between zooplankton and crude oil: toxic effects and bioaccumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Rodrigo Almeda; Zoe Wambaugh; Zucheng Wang; Cammie Hyatt; Zhanfei Liu; Edward J Buskey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of surface-engineered nanoparticle-based dispersants for marine oil spills on the model organism Artemia franciscana.

Authors:  April L Rodd; Megan A Creighton; Charles A Vaslet; J Rene Rangel-Mendez; Robert H Hurt; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  A Comparison of Short-Term and Continuous Exposures in Toxicity Tests of Produced Waters, Condensate, and Crude Oil to Marine Invertebrates and Fish.

Authors:  Francesca Gissi; Joanna Strzelecki; Monique T Binet; Lisa A Golding; Merrin S Adams; Travis S Elsdon; Tim Robertson; Sharon E Hook
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.