Literature DB >> 22488292

Application of statistics in establishing diagnostic certainty.

Craig R Denegar1, Mitchell L Cordova.   

Abstract

The examination and assessment of injured and ill patients leads to the establishment of a diagnosis. However, the tests and procedures used in health care, including procedures performed by certified athletic trainers, are individually and collectively imperfect in confirming or ruling out a condition of concern. Thus, research into the utility of diagnostic tests is needed to identify the procedures that are most helpful and to indicate the confidence one should place in the results of the test. The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of selected statistical procedures and the interpretation of data appropriate for assessing the utility of diagnostic tests with dichotomous (positive or negative) outcomes, with particular attention to the interpretation of sensitivity and specificity estimates and the reporting of confidence intervals around likelihood ratio estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22488292      PMCID: PMC3418138          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.2.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  10 in total

Review 1.  Examining diagnostic tests: an evidence-based perspective.

Authors:  J M Fritz; R S Wainner
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2001-09

2.  How useful are physical examination procedures? Understanding and applying likelihood ratios.

Authors:  Craig R Denegar; Missy Fraser
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Giving clinicians more to work with: let's incorporate confidence intervals into our data.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies.

Authors:  D L Simel; G P Samsa; D B Matchar
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; G H Guyatt; D L Sackett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.

Authors:  I G Stiell; G H Greenberg; R D McKnight; R C Nair; I McDowell; J R Worthington
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  The tuning fork test--a useful tool for improving specificity in "Ottawa positive" patients after ankle inversion injury.

Authors:  P D Dissmann; K H Han
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review.

Authors:  Lucas M Bachmann; Esther Kolb; Michael T Koller; Johann Steurer; Gerben ter Riet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

9.  Prospective validation and head-to-head comparison of 3 ankle rules in a pediatric population.

Authors:  Jocelyn Gravel; Philip Hedrei; Guy Grimard; Serge Gouin
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 5.721

10.  The use of a tuning fork and stethoscope to identify fractures.

Authors:  Michael Bryan Moore
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cohort study design: an underutilized approach for advancement of evidence-based and patient-centered practice in athletic training.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson; Craig R Denegar
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.860

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.