BACKGROUND: Since 2006, in Germany colorectal cancer patients can be treated in certified colorectal cancer centers. The aim of this explorative study was to investigate whether there are differences in the quality of life (QoL) of colorectal cancer patients who were treated in certified versus noncertified centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 284 colorectal cancer patients participated in the study: 184 patients from certified colorectal cancer centers and 100 patients from noncertified centers. Data on QoL (using the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC-QLQ C30)), patient satisfaction, mental distress and sociodemographic data were assessed with a questionnaire in a written survey after the hospital stay. The moderating influence of patientrelated characteristics (e.g. age, sex, patient satisfaction, and psychological distress) and cancerrelated factors (Union internationale contre le cancer (UICC) stage) were tested. RESULTS: On a descriptive level, patients from noncertified centers had a higher QoL in 5 subdimensions (higher physical and role functioning and less insomnia, appetite loss and financial difficulties). After adjustment, only 2 differences remained significant: physical functioning (p < 0.01) and role functioning (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Structural improvements in the oncological care are not necessarily reflected in a better QoL of the patients treated in certified colorectal cancer centers. The findings are discussed in the context of the applied study design.
BACKGROUND: Since 2006, in Germany colorectal cancerpatients can be treated in certified colorectal cancer centers. The aim of this explorative study was to investigate whether there are differences in the quality of life (QoL) of colorectal cancerpatients who were treated in certified versus noncertified centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 284 colorectal cancerpatients participated in the study: 184 patients from certified colorectal cancer centers and 100 patients from noncertified centers. Data on QoL (using the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC-QLQ C30)), patient satisfaction, mental distress and sociodemographic data were assessed with a questionnaire in a written survey after the hospital stay. The moderating influence of patientrelated characteristics (e.g. age, sex, patient satisfaction, and psychological distress) and cancerrelated factors (Union internationale contre le cancer (UICC) stage) were tested. RESULTS: On a descriptive level, patients from noncertified centers had a higher QoL in 5 subdimensions (higher physical and role functioning and less insomnia, appetite loss and financial difficulties). After adjustment, only 2 differences remained significant: physical functioning (p < 0.01) and role functioning (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Structural improvements in the oncological care are not necessarily reflected in a better QoL of the patients treated in certified colorectal cancer centers. The findings are discussed in the context of the applied study design.