Literature DB >> 22487467

Direct histological processing of EUS biopsies enables rapid molecular biomarker analysis for interventional pancreatic cancer trials.

Rebecca J Brais1, Susan E Davies, Maria O'Donovan, Ben W Simpson, Natalie Cook, Walter C Darbonne, Sian Chilcott, Martijn P Lolkema, Albrecht Neesse, Michelle Lockley, Pippa G Corrie, Duncan I Jodrell, Raaj K Praseedom, Emmanuel L Huguet, Asif Jah, Neville V Jamieson, Frederic J de Sauvage, David A Tuveson, Nicholas R Carroll.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current practice to diagnose pancreatic cancer is accomplished by endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) using a cytological approach. This method is time consuming and often fails to provide suitable specimens for modern molecular analyses. Here, we compare the cytological approach with direct formalin fixation of pancreatic EUS-FNA micro-cores and evaluate the potential to perform molecular biomarker analysis on these specimen.
METHODS: 130 specimens obtained by EUS-FNA with a 22G needle were processed by the standard cytological approach and compared to a separate cohort of 130 specimens that were immediately formalin fixed to preserve micro-cores of tissue prior to routine histological processing.
RESULTS: We found that direct formalin fixation significantly shortened the time required for diagnosis from 3.6 days to 2.9 days (p<0.05) by reducing the average time (140 vs 33 min/case) and number of slides (9.65 vs 4.67 slides/case) for histopathological processing. Specificity and sensitivity yielded comparable results between the two approaches (82.3% vs 77% and 90.9% vs 100%). Importantly, EUS-FNA histology preserved the tumour tissue architecture with neoplastic glands embedded in stroma in 67.89% of diagnostic cases compared to 27.55% with the standard cytological approach (p < 0.001). Furthermore, micro-core samples were suitable for molecular studies including the immunohistochemical detection of intranuclear Hes1 in malignant cells, and the laser-capture microdissection-mediated measurement of Gli-1 mRNA in tumour stromal myofibroblasts.
CONCLUSIONS: Direct formalin fixation of pancreatic EUS-FNA micro-cores demonstrates superiority regarding diagnostic delay, costs, and specimen suitability for molecular studies. We advocate this approach for future investigational trials in pancreatic cancer patients.
Copyright © 2012 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22487467     DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2011.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreatology        ISSN: 1424-3903            Impact factor:   3.996


  17 in total

Review 1.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the molecular diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Bournet; Marion Gayral; Jérôme Torrisani; Janick Selves; Pierre Cordelier; Louis Buscail
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Diagnostic yield of small histological cores obtained with a new EUS-guided fine needle biopsy system.

Authors:  Takuya Ishikawa; Rachid Mohamed; Steven J Heitman; Christian Turbide; Puja R Kumar; Hidemi Goto; Yoshiki Hirooka; Paul J Belletrutti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Pancreatic cancer: why is it so hard to treat?

Authors:  Paul E Oberstein; Kenneth P Olive
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 4.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: How to obtain a core biopsy?

Authors:  Lorenzo Fuccio; Alberto Larghi
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 5.  How Grim is Pancreatic Cancer?

Authors:  Elroy Patrick Weledji; George Enoworock; Martin Mokake; Motaze Sinju
Journal:  Oncol Rev       Date:  2016-07-06

6.  Low diagnostic yield of transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using the 19-gauge Flex needle: A large multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Fabia Attili; Carlo Fabbri; Ichiro Yasuda; Lorenzo Fuccio; Laurent Palazzo; Ilaria Tarantino; John Dewitt; Leonardo Frazzoni; Mihai Rimbaş; Alberto Larghi
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 7.  Emerging concepts in pancreatic cancer medicine: targeting the tumor stroma.

Authors:  Albrecht Neesse; Sebastian Krug; Thomas M Gress; David A Tuveson; Patrick Michl
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Initial experience with a novel EUS-guided core biopsy needle (SharkCore): results of a large North American multicenter study.

Authors:  Christopher J DiMaio; Jennifer M Kolb; Petros C Benias; Hiral Shah; Shashin Shah; Oleh Haluszka; Jennifer Maranki; Kaveh Sharzehi; Eric Lam; Stuart R Gordon; Sarah M Hyder; Pavlos Z Kaimakliotis; Satya B Allaparthi; Frank G Gress; Amrita Sethi; Ashish R Shah; Jose Nieto; Vivek Kaul; Shivangi Kothari; Truptesh H Kothari; Sammy Ho; Manhal J Izzy; Neil R Sharma; Rabindra R Watson; V Raman Muthusamy; Douglas K Pleskow; Tyler M Berzin; Mandeep Sawhney; Emad Aljahdi; Marvin Ryou; Clarence K Wong; Parantap Gupta; Dennis Yang; Susana Gonzalez; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-08-30

9.  Analysis of Important Gene Ontology Terms and Biological Pathways Related to Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Hang Yin; ShaoPeng Wang; Yu-Hang Zhang; Yu-Dong Cai; Hailin Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  How to prepare, handle, read, and improve EUS-FNA and fine-needle biopsy for solid pancreatic lesions: The pathologist's role.

Authors:  Katharina Biermann; María Dolores Lozano Escario; Shantel Hébert-Magee; Guido Rindi; Claudio Doglioni
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.