Literature DB >> 22487348

Markedly different clustering of CVD risk factors in New Zealand Indian and European people but similar risk scores (PREDICT-14).

Lavinia Perumal1, Susan Wells, Shanthi Ameratunga, Romana D Pylypchuk, C Raina Elley, Tania Riddell, Andrew Kerr, Sue Crengle, Dudley Gentles, Rod Jackson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profiles of Indian and European patients from routine primary care assessments in the northern region of New Zealand.
METHOD: Anonymous CVD risk profiles were extracted from PREDICT (a web-based decision support program) for Indian and European patients aged 35-74 years. Linear regression models were used to obtain mean differences adjusted for age, gender and deprivation.
RESULTS: At recruitment, Indian participants (n=8,830) were younger than Europeans (n=47,091), in keeping with national guidelines that recommend earlier CVD risk assessment for Indians. Compared with Europeans, a greater proportion of Indian participants lived in areas of higher deprivation and had a two to four-fold greater burden of diabetes in all age groups. Indian participants had a significantly lower proportion of smokers and a lower mean systolic blood pressure. The respective cardiovascular risk factor profiles lead to similar age-adjusted Framingham five-year CVD risk scores. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: National data sources indicate that there are higher rates of hospitalisations and deaths from CVD in Indians compared with Europeans. Our study found similar predicted CVD risk in these two populations despite markedly different clustering of risk factors, suggesting that the Framingham risk equation may underestimate risk in Indians. There is a need for better ethnicity coding to identify all South Asian ethnicities.
© 2012 The Authors. ANZJPH © 2012 Public Health Association of Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22487348     DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00808.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  5 in total

1.  Relationship between different cardiovascular risk scores and measures of subclinical atherosclerosis in an Indian population.

Authors:  Manish Bansal; Ravi R Kasliwal; Naresh Trehan
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-05-15

2.  Comparative accuracy of different risk scores in assessing cardiovascular risk in Indians: a study in patients with first myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Manish Bansal; Ravi R Kasliwal; Naresh Trehan
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014-11-10

Review 3.  Cardiovascular risk models for South Asian populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dipesh P Gopal; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Can traditional risk factors explain the higher risk of cardiovascular disease in South Asians compared to Europeans in Norway and New Zealand? Two cohort studies.

Authors:  Kjersti S Rabanal; Haakon E Meyer; Grethe S Tell; Jannicke Igland; Romana Pylypchuk; Suneela Mehta; Bernadette Kumar; Anne Karen Jenum; Randi M Selmer; Rod Jackson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  A cross-sectional validation study comparing the accuracy of different risk scores in assessing the risk of acute coronary syndrome among patients in a tertiary care hospital in Kerala.

Authors:  Gnanaguru Durairaj; Akash Thomas Oommen; M Gopalakrishna Pillai
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2020-04-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.