Literature DB >> 22487222

Risk of residual breast tissue after skin-sparing mastectomy.

Julie Dreadin1, Venetia Sarode, Michel Saint-Cyr, Linda S Hynan, Roshni Rao.   

Abstract

Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) is an accepted surgical option for breast cancer treatment. SSM allows for preservation of the skin envelope and improved cosmesis. Despite initial concerns, large series have not revealed higher recurrence rates. There is, however, a paucity of data regarding the rates of residual breast tissue (RBT) left behind after SSM, what factors influence this, and the oncologic implications of RBT. Retrospective review identified 288 total mastectomies. Patients who had undergone SSM with excision of additional skin for reconstructive purposes, either at the initial oncologic surgery or at subsequent revision, were included in the final study group. Pathologic analysis was performed to evaluate excised skin. Data regarding demographics, tumor type, and treatment were collected. Comparison between patients who had pathologically confirmed RBT in the excised skin and those who did not was performed. Of 288 total mastectomies, 92 were SSM's, and 66 had skin specimens removed for nononcologic reasons, of these, 4 (6%) had RBT. Age at diagnosis (p = 0.806), BMI (p = 0.531), tumor size (p = 0.922), and estrogen receptor status (p > 0.999) did not contribute to increased RBT risk. At median follow-up of 33.5 months, there have been no recurrences. In addition, cost analysis reveals it is likely not cost-effective to perform pathologic evaluation of these specimens. SSM, performed at an academic medical center by fellowship-trained surgeons, has a very low rate of RBT, and does not compromise oncologic outcomes. Routine pathologic assessment of these skin specimens, removed for nononcologic reasons, may not be required.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22487222     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01234.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  4 in total

Review 1.  Oncological safety of prophylactic breast surgery: skin-sparing and nipple-sparing versus total mastectomy.

Authors:  Victorien M T van Verschuer; Marike C Maijers; Carolien H M van Deurzen; Linetta B Koppert
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

2.  The PreQ-20 TRIAL: A prospective cohort study of the oncologic safety, quality of life and cosmetic outcomes of patients undergoing prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Benigno Acea-Nebril; Alejandra García-Novoa; Lourdes García Jiménez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Location and Frequency of Residual Breast Tissue after Mastectomy.

Authors:  Ibrahim Ustun; Kemal Beksac; Olcay Kandemir; Ugur Berberoglu
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Can titanium mesh influence local recurrence management after implant-based breast reconstruction?

Authors:  Egidio Riggio; Camelia Chifu; Gabriele Martelli; Cristina Ferraris
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-09-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.