Literature DB >> 22486942

Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius: clinical challenge and treatment options.

Linda A Frank1, Anette Loeffler.   

Abstract

Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) has emerged as a major therapeutic challenge for small animal veterinarians over the past 10 years and continues to spread worryingly in many countries. This review focuses on the clinical aspects of MRSP infections seen in patients with skin disease and on currently available treatment options. In addition, it discusses the implications for in-contact people, other animals and the environment, because infection control strategies are likely to have a significant impact on treatment success and prevention of spread. There is currently no indication that MRSP is more virulent than meticillin-susceptible S. pseudintermedius, and reported infections have mostly been treated successfully, although possibly with a longer time to resolution than infections with more susceptible S. pseudintermedius. However, in vitro testing of MRSP isolates indicates resistance to most or all antibacterial agents licensed for use in pets. Based on susceptibility results, the most useful systemic antimicrobials may include chloramphenicol, rifampicin, amikacin, clindamycin and/or minocycline. Adverse effects of some of these medications may limit their usefulness. While in vitro susceptibility to vancomycin and linezolid is reported by some laboratories, use of these drugs in animals is strongly discouraged because of ethical considerations. Aggressive topical therapy has been effective as the only treatment in certain cases. Awareness, continued research and comprehensive management of infections are required by veterinary practitioners not only to help treat infected animals but also to limit the spread and prevent the establishment of this highly drug-resistant and zoonotic pathogen in veterinary facilities and in the community.
© 2012 The Authors. Veterinary Dermatology © 2012 ESVD and ACVD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22486942     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01047.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Dermatol        ISSN: 0959-4493            Impact factor:   1.589


  18 in total

1.  Incidence of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from dogs.

Authors:  Randi M Gold; Sara D Lawhon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Novel pseudo-staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec element (ψSCCmec57395) in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius CC45.

Authors:  Vincent Perreten; Pattrarat Chanchaithong; Nuvee Prapasarakul; Alexandra Rossano; Shlomo E Blum; Daniel Elad; Sybille Schwendener
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Ceftaroline versus isolates from animal bite wounds: comparative in vitro activities against 243 isolates, including 156 Pasteurella species isolates.

Authors:  Ellie J C Goldstein; Diane M Citron; C Vreni Merriam; Kerin L Tyrrell
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Occurrence and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. in diseased dogs in Brazil.

Authors:  Flávia Mello Viegas; Jordana Almeida Santana; Brendhal Almeida Silva; Rafael Gariglio Clark Xavier; Cláudia Teixeira Bonisson; Júlia Lara Sette Câmara; Mário Cesar Rennó; João Luis Reis Cunha; Henrique César Pereira Figueiredo; Francisco Carlos Faria Lobato; Rodrigo Otávio Silveira Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Evaluation of Oxacillin and Cefoxitin Disk and MIC Breakpoints for Prediction of Methicillin Resistance in Human and Veterinary Isolates of Staphylococcus intermedius Group.

Authors:  M T Wu; C-A D Burnham; L F Westblade; J Dien Bard; S D Lawhon; M A Wallace; T Stanley; E Burd; J Hindler; R M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Amikacin resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from dogs.

Authors:  R M Gold; N D Cohen; S D Lawhon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in Dogs and Cats by Colombian Veterinarians in the City of Medellin.

Authors:  David A Gómez-Beltrán; David J Schaeffer; Duncan C Ferguson; Laura K Monsalve; David Villar
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-04-26

8.  Influence of hospital size on antimicrobial resistance and advantages of restricting antimicrobial use based on cumulative antibiograms in dogs with Staphylococcus pseudintermedius infections in Japan.

Authors:  Keita Iyori; Taku Shishikura; Kenta Shimoike; Kenichi Minoshima; Ichiro Imanishi; Yoichi Toyoda
Journal:  Vet Dermatol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 1.867

9.  A novel microfluidic wound model for testing antimicrobial agents against Staphylococcus pseudintermedius biofilms.

Authors:  Jacob Terry; Suresh Neethirajan
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 10.435

10.  Comparison of the In vitro Activity of Five Antimicrobial Drugs against Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms.

Authors:  Aude A Ferran; JingJing Liu; Pierre-Louis Toutain; Alain Bousquet-Mélou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.