Literature DB >> 22486733

Marginal emissions factors for the U.S. electricity system.

Kyle Siler-Evans1, Inês Lima Azevedo, M Granger Morgan.   

Abstract

There is growing interest in reducing emissions from electricity generation in the United States (U.S.). Renewable energy, energy efficiency, and energy conservation are all commonly suggested solutions. Both supply- and demand-side interventions will displace energy-and emissions-from conventional generators. Marginal emissions factors (MEFs) give a consistent metric for assessing the avoided emissions resulting from such interventions. This paper presents the first systematic calculation of MEFs for the U.S. electricity system. Using regressions of hourly generation and emissions data from 2006 through 2011, we estimate regional MEFs for CO(2), NO(x), and SO(2), as well as the share of marginal generation from coal-, gas-, and oil-fired generators. Trends in MEFs with respect to system load, time of day, and month are explored. We compare marginal and average emissions factors (AEFs), finding that AEFs may grossly misestimate the avoided emissions resulting from an intervention. We find significant regional differences in the emissions benefits of avoiding one megawatt-hour of electricity: compared to the West, an equivalent energy efficiency measure in the Midwest is expected to avoid roughly 70% more CO(2), 12 times more SO(2), and 3 times more NO(x) emissions.
© 2012 American Chemical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22486733     DOI: 10.1021/es300145v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  9 in total

1.  Regional variations in the health, environmental, and climate benefits of wind and solar generation.

Authors:  Kyle Siler-Evans; Inês Lima Azevedo; M Granger Morgan; Jay Apt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spatially resolved air-water emissions tradeoffs improve regulatory impact analyses for electricity generation.

Authors:  Daniel B Gingerich; Xiaodi Sun; A Patrick Behrer; Inês L Azevedo; Meagan S Mauter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Energy use and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of drones for commercial package delivery.

Authors:  Joshuah K Stolaroff; Constantine Samaras; Emma R O'Neill; Alia Lubers; Alexandra S Mitchell; Daniel Ceperley
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  A measurement strategy to address disparities across household energy burdens.

Authors:  Eric Scheier; Noah Kittner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Lifecycle cost and carbon implications of residential solar-plus-storage in California.

Authors:  Jiajia Zheng; Zih-Ee Lin; Eric Masanet; Ranjit Deshmukh; Sangwon Suh
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-11-22

6.  Why marginal CO2 emissions are not decreasing for US electricity: Estimates and implications for climate policy.

Authors:  Stephen P Holland; Matthew J Kotchen; Erin T Mansur; Andrew J Yates
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Planning for the evolution of the electric grid with a long-run marginal emission rate.

Authors:  Pieter Gagnon; Wesley Cole
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-02-11

8.  Controlling electricity storage to balance electricity costs and greenhouse gas emissions in buildings.

Authors:  Vahid Aryai; Mark Goldsworthy
Journal:  Energy Inform       Date:  2022-07-27

9.  Tracking emissions in the US electricity system.

Authors:  Jacques A de Chalendar; John Taggart; Sally M Benson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.