AIMS: To compare a monotherapy of Er:YAG laser debridement (ERL), wavelength 2940 nm, with mechanical scaling and root planing (SRP) for the treatment of chronic periodontitis using clinical and patient-centred outcomes. METHODS: Twenty-eight participants had two randomly assigned quadrants treated with ERL and two with SRP. Full-mouth plaque index, probing depth, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level and gingival recession were recorded at baseline and 6- and 12-weeks post therapy. A questionnaire was used to assess pain, discomfort and satisfaction during and after treatment. RESULTS:Twenty-two participants completed treatment and had 6- and 12-week clinical re-evaluations. SRP provided greater mean pocket depth reduction at 6- and 12-weeks (p = 0.01 and p = 0.003 respectively), and a greater reduction in pockets ≥ 4 mm at 6 weeks only (p = 0.03) compared with ERL. SRP also resulted in a significant reduction in bleeding on probing (BOP) sites at 12 weeks compared with ERL and a statistically significant greater reduction in mean clinical attachment level (CAL) at 6- (p = 0.02) and 12-weeks (p = 0.03). Patients expressed greater satisfaction with SRP on the day of treatment but were equally satisfied subsequently. CONCLUSION:SRP resulted in a statistically significant greater short-term improvement in clinical parameters and patient satisfaction compared with ERL.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To compare a monotherapy of Er:YAG laser debridement (ERL), wavelength 2940 nm, with mechanical scaling and root planing (SRP) for the treatment of chronic periodontitis using clinical and patient-centred outcomes. METHODS: Twenty-eight participants had two randomly assigned quadrants treated with ERL and two with SRP. Full-mouth plaque index, probing depth, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level and gingival recession were recorded at baseline and 6- and 12-weeks post therapy. A questionnaire was used to assess pain, discomfort and satisfaction during and after treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-two participants completed treatment and had 6- and 12-week clinical re-evaluations. SRP provided greater mean pocket depth reduction at 6- and 12-weeks (p = 0.01 and p = 0.003 respectively), and a greater reduction in pockets ≥ 4 mm at 6 weeks only (p = 0.03) compared with ERL. SRP also resulted in a significant reduction in bleeding on probing (BOP) sites at 12 weeks compared with ERL and a statistically significant greater reduction in mean clinical attachment level (CAL) at 6- (p = 0.02) and 12-weeks (p = 0.03). Patients expressed greater satisfaction with SRP on the day of treatment but were equally satisfied subsequently. CONCLUSION: SRP resulted in a statistically significant greater short-term improvement in clinical parameters and patient satisfaction compared with ERL.
Authors: Vamsi Lavu; Divya Kumar; Dhanadivya Krishnakumar; Aishwarya Maheshkumar; Amit Agarwal; Richard Kirubakaran; M S Muthu Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2022-01-14 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Zhikai Lin; Franz J Strauss; Niklaus P Lang; Anton Sculean; Giovanni E Salvi; Alexandra Stähli Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 3.573