BACKGROUND: X-linked recessive ichthyosis (XLRI) is due to deletions or inactivating mutations in the steroid sulfatase (STS) gene. This results in an accumulation of cholesterol sulphate affecting the packing of intercorneocyte lipids. XLRI is characterized by dry, scaly skin and increased skin barrier permeability; patients are often dependent on daily use of moisturizers. OBJECTIVES: To examine the biophysical and molecular changes in the skin of patients with XLRI compared with healthy volunteers, and to analyse the effects of moisturizers on the patients' barrier function. METHODS: Patients with XLRI (n=14) and healthy controls (n=14) were included in the study. Skin dryness score, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin surface pH were monitored at baseline, and punch biopsies were obtained for mRNA expression profiles determined by oligonucleotide arrays. Measurements were repeated in the patients with XLRI after a 4-week treatment with three different moisturizers on the volar forearms. RESULTS: Patients with XLRI showed, compared with healthy controls, increased dryness and TEWL, equal skin pH and altered expression of 27 genes. There were no signs of activation of inflammation or repair pathways. Five selected genes were significantly altered also on quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. Treatment with the moisturizers showed similar effects: they improved skin dryness but had no effect on TEWL, pH or expression of selected genes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a dysfunctional skin barrier, the limited number of genes altered in XLRI skin suggests that no inflammatory or repair mechanisms are triggered. Treatment with moisturizers does not have any major impact on the skin barrier properties of patients with XLRI.
BACKGROUND:X-linked recessive ichthyosis (XLRI) is due to deletions or inactivating mutations in the steroid sulfatase (STS) gene. This results in an accumulation of cholesterol sulphate affecting the packing of intercorneocyte lipids. XLRI is characterized by dry, scaly skin and increased skin barrier permeability; patients are often dependent on daily use of moisturizers. OBJECTIVES: To examine the biophysical and molecular changes in the skin of patients with XLRI compared with healthy volunteers, and to analyse the effects of moisturizers on the patients' barrier function. METHODS:Patients with XLRI (n=14) and healthy controls (n=14) were included in the study. Skin dryness score, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin surface pH were monitored at baseline, and punch biopsies were obtained for mRNA expression profiles determined by oligonucleotide arrays. Measurements were repeated in the patients with XLRI after a 4-week treatment with three different moisturizers on the volar forearms. RESULTS:Patients with XLRI showed, compared with healthy controls, increased dryness and TEWL, equal skin pH and altered expression of 27 genes. There were no signs of activation of inflammation or repair pathways. Five selected genes were significantly altered also on quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. Treatment with the moisturizers showed similar effects: they improved skin dryness but had no effect on TEWL, pH or expression of selected genes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a dysfunctional skin barrier, the limited number of genes altered in XLRI skin suggests that no inflammatory or repair mechanisms are triggered. Treatment with moisturizers does not have any major impact on the skin barrier properties of patients with XLRI.
Authors: Mi-Ran Kim; Vinzenz Oji; Frederic Valentin; Heiko Traupe; Jerzy-Roch Nofer; Ingrid Hausser; Hans Christian Hennies; Katja Eckl; Stefan A Wudy; Alberto Sánchez-Guijo; Laura Kerschke; Judith Fischer; Kira Süßmuth Journal: Acta Derm Venereol Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 3.875
Authors: Noo Ri Lee; Na Young Yoon; Minyoung Jung; Ji-Yun Kim; Seong Jun Seo; Hye-Young Wang; Hyeyoung Lee; Young Bae Sohn; Eung Ho Choi Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Robert H Rice; Katie M Bradshaw; Blythe P Durbin-Johnson; David M Rocke; Richard A Eigenheer; Brett S Phinney; Matthias Schmuth; Robert Gruber Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 3.240