Literature DB >> 22485043

The effect of morphological complexity on verbal working memory: results from Arabic speaking children.

Ravit Cohen-Mimran1, Jasmeen Adwan-Mansour, Shimon Sapir.   

Abstract

To examine the role of morphology in verbal working memory. Forty nine children, all native speakers of Arabic from the same region and of the same dialect, performed a Listening Word Span Task, whereby they had to recall Arabic uninflected words (i.e., base words), inflected words with regular (possessive) morphology, or inflected words with irregular (broken plural) morphology. Each of these words was at the end of a sentence (henceforth, target word). The participant's task was to listen to a series of sentences and then recall the target words. Recall of inflected words was significantly poorer than uninflected words, and recall of words with regular morphology was significantly poorer than recall of words with irregular morphology. These findings, albeit preliminary, suggest a role of morphology in verbal working memory. They also suggest that, at least in Arabic, regular morphological forms are decomposed into their component elements and hence impose an extra load on the central executive and episodic buffer components of working memory. Furthermore, in concert with findings from other studies, they suggest that the effect of morphology on working memory is probably language-specific. The clinical implications of the present findings are addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22485043     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-012-9200-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  14 in total

1.  Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology.

Authors:  R Frost; A Deutsch; K I Forster
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Reassessing working memory: comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996).

Authors:  Maryellen C MacDonald; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  T F Münte; T Say; H Clahsen; K Schiltz; M Kutas
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1999-01

5.  The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: critique of Just and Carpenter (1992)

Authors:  G S Waters; D Caplan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation.

Authors:  R Frost; K I Forster; A Deutsch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect.

Authors:  M Taft
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1979-07

8.  Effect of sentence length and complexity on working memory performance in Hungarian children with specific language impairment (SLI): A cross-linguistic comparison.

Authors:  Klara Marton; Richard G Schwartz; Lajos Farkas; Valeriya Katsnelson
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Recall of morphologically complex forms is affected by memory task but not dyslexia.

Authors:  Elisabet Service; Anna-Mari Tujulin
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  The nature of regularity and irregularity: evidence from Hebrew nominal inflection.

Authors:  Iris Berent; Steven Pinker; Joseph Shimron
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Differential recall of derived and inflected word forms in working memory: examining the role of morphological information in simple and complex working memory tasks.

Authors:  Elisabet Service; Sini Maury
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.