Literature DB >> 22484591

Clinical outcome in patients with hilar malignant strictures type II Bismuth-Corlette treated by minimally invasive unilateral versus bilateral endoscopic biliary drainage.

Milutin Bulajic1, Nikola Panic, Miodrag Radunovic, Radisav Scepanovic, Radoslav Perunovic, Predrag Stevanovic, Tatjana Ille, Maurizio Zilli, Mirko Bulajic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stenting of malignant hilar strictures remains a standard endoscopic treatment in patients with unresectable tumors. The aim of this two-center prospective study was to compare unilateral versus bilateral drainage in hilar malignant stenosis Bismuth-Corlette type II.
METHODS: During a 3-year period, a total of 49 patients with hilar tumors (Bismuth-Corlette type II) were referred for endoscopic treatment, following the criteria of unresectability. Ultrasound, computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) were previously performed in all patients in order to facilitate endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The stricture was first passed by the hydrophilic guide-wire and then contrast medium was injected. Mechanical bile duct dilation was performed, followed by plastic stent placement only in the liver lobe which was previously opacified. The procedures were performed under conscious sedation. The patients were followed up for the next 12 months with a stent exchange every 3 months. Primary outcome was assessed by patient survival in the first 12 months after the procedure.
RESULTS: All 49 patients were treated with ERCP while 39 (79.59%) had successful stent placement. Among these, 32 had hilar cholangiocarcinoma (82%) and 7 (18%) had gallbladder cancer. Two groups of patients had Bismuth II strictures: A, 21 patients (54%) with unilateral contrast injection and drainage, and B, 18 (46%) with bilateral contrast injection and drainage. A total of 57 plastic stents were used (10 Fr, 89%; 11.5 Fr, 11%). Group B showed a lower bilirubin level 7 days after the procedure (P=0.008). Early complications were cholangitis (3 patients, 2 in group A and 1 in group B) and acute pancreatitis (2 patients, 1 each in A and B) with no statistical difference between the groups. Late complications were stent migration (5 patients, 1 in A and 4 in B) and stent clogging (6 patients, 2 in A and 4 in B) showing a significant difference between the groups (P<0.01). The first stent replacement after 3 months was successful in 87% of patients (four died due to disease progression and one due to cardiopulmonary insufficiency) showing no statistical difference between the groups. At 6 months follow-up, 72% patients survived, with no statistical difference between the groups. A final follow-up (12 months) showed the survival rate of 18% (4 patients from group A and 3 from group B) (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A minimally invasive approach, based on the criterion that every bile duct being opacified needs to be drained, is associated with a lower incidence of early complications. Considering that the clinical outcome measured by bilirubin level was lower in patients with bilateral drainage 7 days after the procedure, we assumed that drainage of 50% or more of the liver volume leads to sufficient drainage effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22484591     DOI: 10.1016/s1499-3872(12)60150-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int


  9 in total

1.  Biliary drainage strategy of unresectable malignant hilar strictures by computed tomography volumetry.

Authors:  Ei Takahashi; Mitsuharu Fukasawa; Tadashi Sato; Shinichi Takano; Makoto Kadokura; Hiroko Shindo; Yudai Yokota; Nobuyuki Enomoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Palliative therapy in pancreatic cancer-interventional treatment with stents.

Authors:  Alexander Waldthaler; Wiktor Rutkowski; Roberto Valente; Urban Arnelo; J-Matthias Löhr
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-01-31

3.  Air cholangiography in endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent placement of metallic stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Jae Min Lee; Sang Hyub Lee; Dong Kee Jang; Kwang Hyun Chung; Jin Myung Park; Woo Hyun Paik; Jun Kyu Lee; Ji Kon Ryu; Yong-Tae Kim
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.409

4.  A preliminary single-center investigation of percutaneous biliary stenting in malignant hilar biliary obstruction: what impacts the clinical success and the long-term outcomes?

Authors:  Xiaonan Mao; Feng Wen; Hongyuan Liang; Wei Sun; Zaiming Lu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Should patients with unresectable gallbladder cancer with hilar involvement undergo unilateral or bilateral percutaneous biliary drainage in the setting of cholangitis?

Authors:  Pankaj Gupta; Varun Bansal; Naveen Kalra; Jayanta Samanta; Harshal Mandavdhare; Vishal Sharma; Usha Dutta; Rakesh Kochhar; Manavjit Singh Sandhu
Journal:  Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2021-03-25

6.  Can we insert a covered stent, partially or not, in case of hilar biliary stenosis?

Authors:  Guido Costamagna; Andrea Tringali
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-11-22

7.  Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction?

Authors:  Frédérick Moryoussef; Adrien Sportes; Sarah Leblanc; Jean Baptiste Bachet; Stanislas Chaussade; Frédéric Prat
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 8.  Endoscopic drainage in patients with inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ye Jin Park; Dae Hwan Kang
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 9.  Endoscopic Stenting in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: When, How, and How Much to Drain?

Authors:  Andrea Tringali; Ivo Boškoski; Guido Costamagna
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.260

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.