| Literature DB >> 22484467 |
Markus Hoffmann1, Silke Tribius2, Elgar Susanne Quabius3, Hannes Henry4, Saskia Pfannenschmidt4, Claudia Burkhardt4, Tibor Görögh4, Gordana Halec5, Anna Sophie Hoffmann6, Tomas Kahn7, Christoph Röcken8, Jochen Haag8, Tim Waterboer5, Markus Schmitt5.
Abstract
It has been proposed that p16(INK4A) qualifies as a surrogate marker for viral oncogene activity in head and neck cancer (HNSCC). By analyzing 78 HNSCC we sought to validate the accuracy of p16(INK4A) as a reliable marker of active HPV infections in HNSCC. To this end we determined HPV DNA (HPVD) and E6*I mRNA (HPVR) expression status and correlated these results with p16(INK4A) staining. In tonsillar SCC 12/20 were HPVD+ and 12/12 of these showed active HPV infections whereas in non-tonsillar SCC 10/58 were HPVD+ and 5/10 showed active HPV infections. Thus, we prove about 8% of non-tonsillar SCC to be also correlated with HPV-associated carcinogenesis. Strikingly, 3/14 (21.4%) of tonsillar and non-tonsillar HPVD+/HPVR+ cases did not show p16(INK4A) overexpression and these cases would have been missed when applying initial p16(INK4A) staining only. However, in 13 cases negative for HPV, DNA p16(INK4A) was overexpressed. In conclusion, our data confirm tonsillar SCC to be predominantly but not only associated with active HPV infections. Furthermore, our data show that p16(INK4A) overexpression is not evident in a subgroup of HNSCC with active HPV infection. Definitive HPV data should therefore be utilized in diagnostics and treatment modalities of HPV positive and HPV negative HNSCC patients, resulting in a paradigm shift regarding these obviously different tumor entities.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22484467 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.03.033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Lett ISSN: 0304-3835 Impact factor: 8.679