Literature DB >> 22484017

Acute neuroprotective effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields after traumatic brain injury in rats.

Yang Yang1, Ling Li, Yan-Gang Wang, Zhou Fei, Jun Zhong, Li-Zhou Wei, Qian-Fa Long, Wei-Ping Liu.   

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury commonly has a result of a short window of opportunity between the period of initial brain injury and secondary brain injury, which provides protective strategies and can reduce damages of brain due to secondary brain injury. Previous studies have reported neuroprotective effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields. However, the effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields on neural damage after traumatic brain injury have not been reported yet. The present study aims to investigate effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields on neuroprotection after traumatic brain injury. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were used for the model of lateral fluid percussion injury, which were placed in non-electromagnetic fields and 15 Hz (Hertz) electromagnetic fields with intensities of 1 G (Gauss), 3 G and 5 G. At various time points (ranging from 0.5 to 30 h) after lateral fluid percussion injury, rats were treated with kainic acid (administered by intraperitoneal injection) to induce apoptosis in hippocampal cells. The results were as follows: (1) the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α was dramatically decreased during the neuroprotective time window. (2) The kainic acid-induced apoptosis in the hippocampus was significantly decreased in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields. (3) Electromagnetic fields exposure shortened the escape time in water maze test. (4) Electromagnetic fields exposure accelerated the recovery of the blood-brain barrier after brain injury. These findings revealed that extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields significantly prolong the window of opportunity for brain protection and enhance the intensity of neuroprotection after traumatic brain injury.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22484017     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  10 in total

1.  Extremely low frequency electromagnetic stimulation reduces ischemic stroke volume by improving cerebral collateral blood flow.

Authors:  Hannelore Kemps; Chantal Dessy; Laurent Dumas; Pierre Sonveaux; Lotte Alders; Jana Van Broeckhoven; Lena Perez Font; Sara Lambrichts; Sébastien Foulquier; Sven Hendrix; Bert Brône; Robin Lemmens; Annelies Bronckaers
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.960

2.  Curcumin abates hypoxia-induced oxidative stress based-ER stress-mediated cell death in mouse hippocampal cells (HT22) by controlling Prdx6 and NF-κB regulation.

Authors:  Bhavana Chhunchha; Nigar Fatma; Eri Kubo; Prerana Rai; Sanjay P Singh; Dhirendra P Singh
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.249

3.  Improvement of spatial memory disorder and hippocampal damage by exposure to electromagnetic fields in an Alzheimer's disease rat model.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Hongyan Zuo; Dewen Wang; Ruiyun Peng; Tao Song; Shuiming Wang; Xinping Xu; Yabing Gao; Yang Li; Shaoxia Wang; Lifeng Wang; Li Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Neuroprotective effects of sevoflurane against electromagnetic pulse-induced brain injury through inhibition of neuronal oxidative stress and apoptosis.

Authors:  Bin Deng; Hao Xu; Jin Zhang; Jin Wang; Li-Chun Han; Li-Ya Li; Guang-Li Wu; Yan-Ning Hou; Guo-Zhen Guo; Qiang Wang; Han-Fei Sang; Li-Xian Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of Intermediate-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Recovery following Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats.

Authors:  Leticia Verdugo-Diaz; Francisco Estrada-Rojo; Aron Garcia-Espinoza; Eduardo Hernandez-Lopez; Alejandro Hernandez-Chavez; Carlos Guzman-Uribe; Marina Martinez-Vargas; Adan Perez-Arredondo; Tomas Calvario; David Elias-Viñas; Luz Navarro
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation: from acute to late-stage treatment of central nervous system damage.

Authors:  Petra Henrich-Noack; Elena G Sergeeva; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.135

7.  In vitro Magnetic Stimulation: A Simple Stimulation Device to Deliver Defined Low Intensity Electromagnetic Fields.

Authors:  Stephanie Grehl; David Martina; Catherine Goyenvalle; Zhi-De Deng; Jennifer Rodger; Rachel M Sherrard
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Neural circuit repair by low-intensity magnetic stimulation requires cellular magnetoreceptors and specific stimulation patterns.

Authors:  T Dufor; S Grehl; A D Tang; M Doulazmi; M Traoré; N Debray; C Dubacq; Z-D Deng; J Mariani; A M Lohof; R M Sherrard
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 9.  Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Field as a Stress Factor-Really Detrimental?-Insight into Literature from the Last Decade.

Authors:  Angelika Klimek; Justyna Rogalska
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-31

Review 10.  Magnetic field effects in biology from the perspective of the radical pair mechanism.

Authors:  Hadi Zadeh-Haghighi; Christoph Simon
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.293

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.