Literature DB >> 22483859

Efficacy and safety of self-expandable metal stents for biliary decompression in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: a prospective study.

A Aziz Aadam1, Douglas B Evans, Abdul Khan, Young Oh, Kulwinder Dua.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer are receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Biliary drainage with plastic stents during this period can be associated with recurrent episodes of stent occlusion resulting in unplanned ERCPs and interruptions in therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) during the neoadjuvant period for resectable pancreatic cancer.
DESIGN: Patients with proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma with biliary obstruction underwent placement of SEMSs, and data on stent patency and complication rates were collected prospectively.
SETTING: Tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: This study involved 55 patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma who were recruited between March 2009 and December 2010. INTERVENTION: SEMSs were placed for biliary decompression. The shortest length of stent required to bridge the stricture was used so as to leave enough of the normal bile duct above the stent available for subsequent surgical anastomosis. Endoscopic reintervention was performed in those with stent malfunction. Stents were not removed before surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Stent patency rate during the neoadjuvant period, stent malfunction rate, and complication rates. Information on stent-related difficulties, if any, during surgery.
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were recruited (29 men, 26 women; age, mean [± SD] 65.9 ± 11 years; resectable 23, borderline resectable 32). Median time for neoadjuvant therapy and restaging before surgery was 104 days (range 70-260 days). At the median time of 104 days, 88% of SEMSs remained patent. By 260 days, stent malfunction occurred in 15% of patients. These included stent occlusion in 13% and stent migration in 2%. SEMS malfunction occurred in 3 of 27 patients (11%) who ultimately underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and in 5 of 21 patients (24%) with disease progression (P = not significant). The presence of SEMSs did not interfere with pancreaticoduodenectomy in any patients who underwent surgery. LIMITATIONS: Nonrandomized study.
CONCLUSION: SEMSs are effective and safe in achieving durable biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy. It is not necessary to remove SEMSs before surgery if the shortest length of stent required to bridge the stricture is used.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22483859     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  33 in total

Review 1.  Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions and management.

Authors:  Nicole E Lopez; Cristina Prendergast; Andrew M Lowy
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Endoscopic treatment for distal malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Kazuya Matsumoto; Yohei Takeda; Takumi Onoyama; Soichiro Kawata; Hiroki Kurumi; Hiroki Koda; Taro Yamashita; Hajime Isomoto
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-04

3.  Comparative long-term outcomes of upfront resected pancreatic cancer after preoperative biliary drainage.

Authors:  Tobin J Strom; Jason B Klapman; Gregory M Springett; Kenneth L Meredith; Sarah E Hoffe; Junsung Choi; Pamela Hodul; Mokenge P Malafa; Ravi Shridhar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Self-expanding metal stents for preoperative biliary drainage in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Amanpal Singh; Jeffrey H Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-12

5.  Biliary stents for pancreas cancer with obstruction: the problem with plastic.

Authors:  Brian R Boulay
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-12

6.  To drain or not to drain? That is the question.

Authors:  Guido Costamagna; Ivo Boškoski
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Evolution in the utilization of biliary interventions in the United States: results of a nationwide longitudinal study from 1998 to 2013.

Authors:  Robert J Huang; Nirav C Thosani; Monique T Barakat; Abhishek Choudhary; Alka Mithal; Gurkirpal Singh; Saurabh Sethi; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Biliary self-expandable metal stents do not adversely affect pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Lianne K Cavell; Peter J Allen; Cjloe Vinoya; Anne A Eaton; Mithat Gonen; Hans Gerdes; Robin B Mendelsohn; Michael I D'Angelica; T Peter Kingham; Yuman Fong; Ronald Dematteo; William R Jarnagin; Robert C Kurtz; Mark A Schattner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Amanda B Cooper; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2013-09

10.  Cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of biliary stents in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Timothy B Gardner; Chad C Spangler; Katerina L Byanova; Gregory H Ripple; Matthew J Rockacy; John M Levenick; Kerrington D Smith; Thomas A Colacchio; Richard J Barth; Bassem I Zaki; Michael J Tsapakos; Stuart R Gordon
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 9.427

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.