Literature DB >> 22483722

Patients with hemispatial neglect are more prone to limb spasticity, but this does not prolong their hospital stay.

David Wilkinson1, Mohamed Sakel, Sarah-Jayne Camp, Lara Hammond.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether stroke patients who suffer from hemispatial neglect tend to stay in hospitals longer because they are prone to limb spasticity.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of inpatient medical notes.
SETTING: Inpatient neurorehabilitation unit of a regional UK teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All patients (N=106) admitted to the neurorehabilitation unit between 2008 and 2010 who had suffered a stroke, as confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Statistical coincidence of hemispatial neglect and spasticity; length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: Chi-square analyses indicated that individuals with left neglect were nearly one third more likely to develop spasticity than those without neglect (87% vs 57%), while nearly one half of those with left-sided spasticity showed neglect (44% vs 13%). Individuals with neglect stayed in the hospital 45 days longer than those without neglect, but the presence or absence of spasticity did not affect length of stay.
CONCLUSIONS: The results provide the first statistical evidence, to the best of our knowledge, that neglect and limb spasticity tend to co-occur poststroke, though it is only the former that significantly prolongs stay. Diagnostic value aside, these results are important because they tell us that the treatment of neglect should not be overshadowed by efforts to reduce comorbid spasticity. Despite its poor prognosis, hemispatial neglect continues to receive little targeted therapy in some units.
Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22483722     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  7 in total

1.  Impact of spatial neglect on stroke rehabilitation: evidence from the setting of an inpatient rehabilitation facility.

Authors:  Peii Chen; Kimberly Hreha; Yekyung Kong; A M Barrett
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process uniquely measures spatial neglect during activities of daily living.

Authors:  Peii Chen; Christine C Chen; Kimberly Hreha; Kelly M Goedert; A M Barrett
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  B González-Rodriguez; N Serradell-Ribé; R Viejo-Sobera; J P Romero-Muñoz; Elena M Marron
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 6.682

4.  Patching for Diplopia Contraindicated in Patients with Brain Injury?

Authors:  Kevin E Houston; A M Barrett
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Barriers and Facilitators to Rehabilitation Care of Individuals With Spatial Neglect: A Qualitative Study of Professional Views.

Authors:  Peii Chen; Jeanne Zanca; Emily Esposito; A M Barrett
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2021-03-31

6.  Effects of Prism Adaptation on Reference Systems for Extrapersonal Space in Neglect Patients.

Authors:  Laura Abbruzzese; Alessio Damora; Gabriella Antonucci; Pierluigi Zoccolotti; Mauro Mancuso
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-11-16

7.  The Effect of a Complex Intervention Program for Unilateral Neglect in Patients with Acute-Phase Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hyun-Se Choi; Deok-Ju Kim; Yeong-Ae Yang
Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect       Date:  2019-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.