Literature DB >> 22483372

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded comparison between multimodal thoracic paravertebral bupivacaine and levobupivacaine analgesia in patients undergoing lung surgery.

Vesna Novak-Jankovic1, Zoka Milan, Iztok Potocnik, Tomaz Stupnik, Stela Maric, Tatjana Stopar-Pintaric, Boriana Kremzar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of paravertebral analgesia with levobupivacaine or bupivacaine on intra- and postoperative pain for thoracic surgery.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study.
SETTING: A university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients received paravertebral catheterization and a bolus (14-20 mL) of 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 20) or 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 20) with morphine, 60 μg/kg, before the induction of general anesthesia that consisted of a propofol infusion. A paravertebral continuous infusion (0.05 mL/kg/h) of 0.25% bupivacaine or 0.25% levobupivacaine, 100 mL, with added morphine, 10 mg, and clonidine, 0.15 mg, was started at the end of surgery for 72 hours postoperatively. Postoperative rescue diclofenac analgesia was available if required.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was intraoperative fentanyl consumption. Static and dynamic pain scores measured by a visual analog scale were assessed regularly. Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in the levobupivacaine group compared with the bupivacaine group (p = 0.001). On all 3 postoperative days, static pain scores were significantly lower in the levobupivacaine group compared with the bupivacaine group (p < 0.05). Dynamic pain scores were significantly lower in the levobupivacaine group compared with the bupivacaine group during the 2 postoperative days (p < 0.05). A smaller proportion of patients in the levobupivacaine group used rescue analgesia (p < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Paravertebral analgesia with levobupivacaine resulted in less intraoperative fentanyl consumption, lower static (3 days) and dynamic (2 days) pain scores, and less rescue analgesia than analgesia with bupivacaine.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22483372     DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.01.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  4 in total

Review 1.  Analgesia for Sheep in Commercial Production: Where to Next?

Authors:  Alison Small; Andrew David Fisher; Caroline Lee; Ian Colditz
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  Thoracic surgery in Slovenia.

Authors:  Tomaž Štupnik
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.005

3.  Levobupivacaine vs. bupivacaine for third molar surgery: quality of anaesthesia, postoperative analgesia and local vascular effects.

Authors:  Denis Brajkovic; Bozidar Brkovic; Marija Milic; Vladimir Biocanin; Elena Krsljak; Dragica Stojic
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  REGIONAL ANAESTHESIA IN THORACIC AND ABDOMINAL SURGERY.

Authors:  Vesna Novak-Jankovič; Jasmina Markovič-Božič
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.780

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.