Literature DB >> 22482969

A prospective study of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical carcinoma in Taiwan.

Chih-Jen Tseng1, Huang-Pin Shen, Yu-Hsiang Lin, Chung-Yuan Lee, Will Wei-Cheng Chiu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Surgical therapy for cervical carcinoma carries a significant risk of functional impairment to the bladder. This study evaluates the feasibility and complications of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NRH) in Taiwan.
METHODS: Between March 2010 and March 2011, consecutive patients diagnosed with early stage cervical cancer (FIGO stage Ia2 to Ib1) and tumor size < 3 cm were recruited prospectively to undergo NRH or conventional radical hysterectomy (RH). Patients with histories of urinary stress incontinence or bladder dysfunction disease were excluded. A modified Tokyo nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled. Among these, 18 patients underwent NRH with successful bilaterally nerve-sparing procedures in 15 cases (83%), unilaterally nerve-sparing procedures in 2 cases (11%), and a failure in 1 case (6%). The indwelling catheter was removed on postoperative day 6. The mean±SD duration from operation to spontaneous voiding was 6.8 ± 1.5 days for women who underwent NRH; the corresponding duration for women who underwent RH or failed NRH was 20.6 ± 3 days. None of the patients who underwent NRH required intermittent catheterization. All 12 patients who underwent RH needed self-catheterization after discharge. There was a significant reduction in the incidence of postoperative self-catheterization (p<0.01) and bladder dysfunction (p<0.006). Average satisfaction score analyzed by the Likert-scale questionnaire was 4.5 for the NRH group and 1.9 for RH group (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the new technique of NRH can reduce postoperative bladder dysfunctions.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22482969     DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1028-4559            Impact factor:   1.705


  5 in total

Review 1.  Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Khadra Galaal; Chetta Ngamjarus; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-12

Review 2.  Lower urinary tract dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hee Seung Kim; Keewon Kim; Seung Bum Ryoo; Joung Hwa Seo; Sang Youn Kim; Ji Won Park; Min A Kim; Kyoung Sup Hong; Chang Wook Jeong; Yong Sang Song
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 4.  Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Long; De-Sheng Yao; Xin-Wei Pan; Ting-Yu Ou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Min Hao; Zhilian Wang; Fang Wei; Jingfang Wang; Wei Wang; Yi Ping
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.437

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.