Literature DB >> 22482963

Robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases: experience of Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan.

Shun-Jen Tan1, Chi-Kung Lin, Pei-Te Fu, Yung-Liang Liu, Cheng-Chian Sun, Cheng-Chang Chang, Mu-Hsien Yu, Hung-Cheng Lai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive surgery has been the trend in various specialties and continues to evolve as new technology develops. The development of robotic surgery in gynecology remains in its infancy. The present study reports the first descriptive series of robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases in Taiwan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2009 to February 2011, the records of patients undergoing robotic surgery using the da Vinci Surgical System were reviewed for patient demographics, indications, operative time, hospital stay, conversion to laparotomy, and complications.
RESULTS: Sixty cases were reviewed in the present study. Forty-nine patients had benign gynecologic diseases, and 11 patients had malignancies. These robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures include nine hysterectomy, 15 subtotal hysterectomy, 13 myomectomy, eight staging operation, two radical hysterectomy, five ovarian cystectomy, one bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and myomectomy, two resections of deep pelvic endometriosis, one pelvic adhesiolysis, three sacrocolpopexy and one tuboplasty. Thirty-three patients had prior pelvic surgery, and one had a history of pelvic radiotherapy. Adhesiolysis was necessary in 38 patients to complete the whole operation. Robotic myomectomy was easily accomplished in patients with huge uterus or multiple myomas. The suturing of myometrium or cervical stump after ligation of the uterine arteries minimized the blood loss. In addition, it was much easier to dissect severe pelvic adhesions. The dissection of para-aortic lymph nodes can be easily accomplished. All these surgeries were performed smoothly without ureteral, bladder or bowel injury.
CONCLUSION: The present analyses include various complicated gynecologic conditions, which make the estimation of the effectiveness of robotic surgery in each situation individually not appropriate. However, our experiences do show that robotic surgery is feasible and safe for patients with complicated gynecologic diseases.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22482963     DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1028-4559            Impact factor:   1.705


  5 in total

1.  Robot-assisted surgery for the radical treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement: short- and mid-term surgical and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Alessandra Perutelli; Matteo Palmeri; Simone Guadagni; Maria Donatella Mariniello; Gregorio Di Franco; Vito Cela; Benedetta Brundu; Maria Giovanna Salerno; Giulio Di Candio; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Anesthetic considerations in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Alan D Kaye; Nalini Vadivelu; Nitin Ahuja; Sukanya Mitra; Dan Silasi; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

Review 3.  Anesthetic Challenges in Robotic-assisted Urologic Surgery.

Authors:  Richard L Hsu; Alan D Kaye; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

Review 4.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: current status.

Authors:  Sara E Arian; Jessian L Munoz; Suejin Kim; Tommaso Falcone
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2017-01-23

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence in reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Renjie Wang; Wei Pan; Lei Jin; Yuehan Li; Yudi Geng; Chun Gao; Gang Chen; Hui Wang; Ding Ma; Shujie Liao
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.906

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.