Literature DB >> 22482861

Practices and complications of vascular closure devices and manual compression in patients undergoing elective transfemoral coronary procedures.

Nathaniel R Smilowitz1, Ajay J Kirtane, Michael Guiry, William A Gray, Pilar Dolcimascolo, Michael Querijero, Claudia Echeverry, Nellie Kalcheva, Braulio Flores, Varinder P Singh, Leroy Rabbani, Susheel Kodali, Michael B Collins, Martin B Leon, Jeffrey W Moses, Giora Weisz.   

Abstract

Femoral arterial puncture is the most common access method for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Access complications, although infrequent, affect morbidity, mortality, costs, and length of hospital stay. Vascular closure devices (VCDs) are used for rapid hemostasis and early ambulation, but there is no consensus on whether VCDs are superior to manual compression (MC). A retrospective review and nested case-control study of consecutive patients undergoing elective transfemoral coronary angiography and PCI over 3 years was performed. Hemostasis strategy was performed according to the operators' discretion. Vascular complications were defined as groin bleeding (hematoma, hemoglobin decrease ≥3 g/dl, transfusion, retroperitoneal bleeding, or arterial perforation), pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula formation, obstruction, or infection. Patients with postprocedure femoral vascular access complications were compared to randomly selected patients without complication. Data were available for 9,108 procedures, of which PCI was performed in 3,172 (34.8%). MC was performed in 2,581 (28.3%) and VCDs (4 different types) were deployed in 6,527 procedures (71.7%). Significant complications occurred in 74 procedures (0.81%), with 32 (1.24%) complications with MC and 42 (0.64%) with VCD (p = 0.004). VCD deployment failed in 80 procedures (1.23%), of which 8 (10%) had vascular complications. VCD use was a predictor of fewer complications (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.83). In the case-control analysis, older age and use of large (7Fr to 8Fr) femoral sheaths were independent predictors of complications. In conclusion, the retrospective analysis of contemporary hemostasis strategies and outcomes in elective coronary procedures identified a low rate of complications (0.81%), with superior results after VCD deployment. Careful selection of hemostasis strategy and closure device may further decrease complication rates.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22482861     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.02.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  15 in total

Review 1.  Radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for vascular complications and bleeding.

Authors:  Sandeep Nathan; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Spontaneous iliopsoas haematoma: a complication of hypertensive urgency.

Authors:  Meera Yogarajah; Bhradeev Sivasambu; Eric A Jaffe
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 3.  Systematic review and cost-benefit analysis of radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention.

Authors:  Matthew D Mitchell; Jaekyoung A Hong; Bruce Y Lee; Craig A Umscheid; Sarah M Bartsch; Creighton W Don
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-06-26

Review 4.  Endovascular Stroke Interventions: Procedural Complications and Management.

Authors:  Ahmed Elakkad; Gerald Drocton; Ferdinand Hui
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Comparison of Exo-Seal(®) and Angio-Seal (®) for arterial puncture site closure: A randomized, multicenter, single-blind trial.

Authors:  Johannes Ketterle; Harald Rittger; Inga Helmig; Lutz Klinghammer; Stefan Zimmermann; Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Johannes Brachmann; Holger Nef; Stephan Achenbach; Christian Schlundt
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Meta-analysis of ProGlide versus MANTA vascular closure devices for large-bore access site management.

Authors:  Gauranga Mahalwar; Mariam Shariff; Sanjana Datla; Ankit Agrawal; Sawai Singh Rathore; Taha Bin Arif; Kinza Iqbal; Nabeel Hussain; Monil Majmundar; Ashish Kumar; Ankur Kalra
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2022-03-31

7.  Groin complications in endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a 10-year single center experience.

Authors:  Veer A Shah; Coleman O Martin; Angela M Hawkins; William E Holloway; Shilpa Junna; Naveed Akhtar
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.836

8.  Effects of position change on lumbar pain and discomfort of Korean patients after invasive percutaneous coronary intervention: a RCT study.

Authors:  Nam Hyun Cha; Sohyune Sok
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-10-28

9.  ANMCO/GICR-IACPR/SICI-GISE Consensus Document: the clinical management of chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Carmine Riccio; Michele Massimo Gulizia; Furio Colivicchi; Andrea Di Lenarda; Giuseppe Musumeci; Pompilio Massimo Faggiano; Maurizio Giuseppe Abrignani; Roberta Rossini; Francesco Fattirolli; Serafina Valente; Gian Francesco Mureddu; Pier Luigi Temporelli; Zoran Olivari; Antonio Francesco Amico; Giancarlo Casolo; Claudio Fresco; Alberto Menozzi; Federico Nardi
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 1.803

10.  Complex Large-Bore Radial percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale of the COLOR trial study protocol.

Authors:  Thomas A Meijers; Adel Aminian; Koen Teeuwen; Marleen van Wely; Thomas Schmitz; Maurits T Dirksen; Rene J van der Schaaf; Juan F Iglesias; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Joseph Dens; Paul Knaapen; Sudhir Rathore; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Jan-Henk E Dambrink; Vincent Roolvink; A T Marcel Gosselink; Renicus S Hermanides; Niels van Royen; Maarten A H van Leeuwen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.