| Literature DB >> 22482701 |
Landry L Lienou1, Bruno P Telefo, Bayala Bale, Didiane Yemele, Richard S Tagne, Stephanie C Goka, Chantal M Lemfack, Celestin Mouokeu, Paul F Moundipa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Senecio biafrae (Asteraceae) is a medicinal plant widely used by traditional healers in the western region of Cameroon for the treatment of female infertility. This experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of the aqueous extract from leaves and stems of S. biafrae (AESb) on the onset of puberty and some biochemical and physiological parameters of reproduction in immature Wistar female rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22482701 PMCID: PMC3350434 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-36
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Figure 1Body weight gain of rats after administration of various doses of AESb. Each point represents mean ± SEM of 13 animals per group. *Values statistically different from that of the control group of each day at P < 0.05 (ANOVA and Fisher PLSD).
Figure 2Food intake of animals in function of the duration of treatment with various doses of AESb. Each point represents mean ± SEM of 13 animals per group.
Figure 3Effect of prepubertal oral administration of AESb on the timing of Puberty onset. Shown on the left are mean day of vaginal opening in control and prepubertal AESb-treated animals. Shown on the right are percentages of animal showing vaginal opening as a function of age in the control and AESb-treated animals. *Values significantly different at p < 0.05 from those of the control group (Kruskal-Wallis followed by Mann-Whitney tests for histograms and Khi Square followed by Fisher Exact tests for lines); each data represents the mean ± SEM of 13 animals.
Frequency (%) of estrous cycle phases at vaginal opening in female rats treated with various doses of AESb
| Cycle phases | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.05 | 42.9 | 33.3 | 4.8 | 100 | |
| 23.1 | 46.2 | 7.7 | 23.1 | 100 | |
| 23.1 | 23.1 | 46.2 | 7.7 | 100 | |
| 38.5 | 38.5 | 15.4 | 7.7 | 100 | |
(Fisher exact and Khi square tests).
Effect of AESb on the duration (days) of the various phases in the estrous cycle
| Doses | Phases of the estrous cycle | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proestrus | Estrus | Metestrus | Diestrus | Cycle Length | |
| 0 mg/kg | 0.80 ± 0.17 | 1.38 ± 0.19 | 0.57 ± 0.11 | 1.22 ± 0.16 | 4.00 ± 0.16 |
| 8 mg/kg | 0.56 ± 0.10 | 1.60 ± 0.19 | 0.57 ± 0.12 | 1.27 ± 0.15 | 4.00 ± 0.11 |
| 32 mg/kg | 0.65 ± 0.13 | 1.58 ± 0.24 | 0.35 ± 0.07 | 1.42 ± 0.17 | 4.00 ± 0.19 |
| 64 mg/kg | 0.75 ± 0.17 | 1.25 ± 0.19 | 0.73 ± 0.14 | 1.28 ± 0.11 | 4.01 ± 0.15 |
The length of the phases is expressed as days. Each value represents the mean ± SEM for 13 animals
Figure 4Effect of AESb on the relative weight of the ovaries (A) and the number of corpora lutea (B). *Values significantly different at (p < 0.05) from those of the control group (ANOVA and Fisher PLSD). Each histogram represents the mean ± SEM of the values for 6 animals.
Figure 5Effect of AESb on uterine relative weight (A) and uterine proteins level (B). *Values significantly different at (p < 0.05) from those of the control group (ANOVA and Fisher PLSD); each histogram represents the mean ± SEM of the values for 6 animals.
Effect of AESb on some fertility and gestational parameters
| Studied parameters | Dosage (mg/kg/Day) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 8 | 32 | 64 | |
| N°Corpora Lutea | 11.9 ± 0.31 | 11.57 ± 0.61 | 11.43 ± 0.90 | 10.33 ± 1.50 |
| N°Implantation sites | 10.80 ± 0.44 | 10.43 ± 0.57 | 10.43 ± 0.75 | 9.00 ± 1.48 |
| N° Fetuses Alive | 9.50 ± 0.50 | 9.29 ± 0.52 | 9.86 ± 0.77 | 7.83 ± 1.68 |
| N°Resorption sites | 1.30 ± 0.47 | 1.00 ± 0.44 | 0.57 ± 0.43 | 1.17 ± 0.48 |
| Mean weight of fetuses (g) | 4.87 ± 0.09 | 5.16 ± 0.17 | 5.24 ± 0.28 | 5.27 ± 0.13 |
| Fixation rate (%) | 90.93 ± 3.36 | 91.10 ± 5.15 | 91.77 ± 1.72 | 84.58 ± 5.06 |
| Preimplantation Loss (%) | 9.07 ± 3.36 | 8.90 ± 5.15 | 8.23 ± 1.72 | 15.42 ± 5.06 |
| Postimplantation Loss (%) | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.05 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.16 |
| Antiimplantation Activity (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.29 |
| Antifertility Activity (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28.57 |
| Resorption Index (%) | 12.037 | 9.589 | 5.480 | 12.963 |
| Gestation Rate (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 85.71 |
Each value represents the mean ± SEM for 7 animals.