| Literature DB >> 22481973 |
Linping Xiong1, Lulu Zhang, Weidong Tang, Yuqin Ma.
Abstract
China launched a pilot project of medical insurance reform in 79 cities in 2007 to cover urban nonworking residents. An urban population model was created in this paper for China's medical insurance scheme using microsimulation model techniques. The model made it clear for the policy makers the population distributions of different groups of people, the potential urban residents entering the medical insurance scheme. The income trends of units of individuals and families were also obtained. These factors are essential in making the challenging policy decisions when considering to balance the long-term financial sustainability of the medical insurance scheme.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22481973 PMCID: PMC3303605 DOI: 10.1155/2012/232071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1Update the 2000 census data to 2005 and target years.
Population distribution in 2000 and benchmarks in 2005 and 2010.
| Items | 2000 | Percentage | 2005 | Percentage | 2010 | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total population | 5772650 | 6085700 | 6355960 | |||
| Natural growth rate | 0.857% | 0.743% | 0.629% | |||
| Adjust growth rate | 1.031% | 0.873% | ||||
|
| ||||||
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 2994930 | 51.88 | 3115270 | 51.19 | 3253620 | 51.19 |
| Female | 2777720 | 48.12 | 2970430 | 48.81 | 3102340 | 48.81 |
|
| ||||||
| Age group | ||||||
| 0–4 | 387340 | 6.71 | 365120 | 6.00 | 338980 | 5.33 |
| 5–14 | 762910 | 13.22 | 719130 | 11.82 | 712930 | 11.22 |
| 15–24 | 1068940 | 18.52 | 1088360 | 17.88 | 1117380 | 17.58 |
| 25–34 | 1230500 | 21.32 | 1280240 | 21.04 | 1316000 | 20.71 |
| 35–44 | 900940 | 15.61 | 953170 | 15.66 | 1001060 | 15.75 |
| 45–54 | 645210 | 11.18 | 704260 | 11.57 | 756680 | 11.91 |
| 55–64 | 384130 | 6.65 | 449010 | 7.38 | 488140 | 7.68 |
| 65 and over | 392690 | 6.80 | 526410 | 8.65 | 624790 | 9.83 |
|
| ||||||
| Residential status | ||||||
| Urban area | 3046230 | 52.77 | 3532750 | 58.05 | 3886030 | 61.14 |
| Rural area | 2726420 | 47.23 | 2552950 | 41.95 | 2469930 | 38.86 |
|
| ||||||
| Nationality | ||||||
| Han | 5025790 | 87.06 | 5265350 | 86.52 | 5462370 | 85.94 |
| Minority | 746860 | 12.94 | 820350 | 13.48 | 893590 | 14.06 |
|
| ||||||
| Education | ||||||
| Tertiary | 404200 | 7.63 | 455700 | 8.09 | 507290 | 8.55 |
| Senior secondary | 778740 | 14.70 | 973360 | 17.28 | 1178330 | 19.86 |
| Junior secondary | 1587680 | 29.97 | 1688170 | 29.97 | 1837500 | 30.97 |
| Primary | 2030030 | 38.32 | 1994600 | 35.41 | 1928280 | 32.50 |
| Other * | 496910 | 9.38 | 521040 | 9.25 | 481770 | 8.12 |
| Under 6 years | 475080 | 452830 | 422790 | |||
Note: *“Other” means illiteracy or semiliterate aged 6 years and over.
Assumptions of population structures for the year 2010.
| Items | Assumptions of proportions |
|---|---|
| Adjusted growth rate | Estimated to be 0.873% |
| Sex | 51.19% for males, 48.81% for females |
| Age group | Age group 0–14 years reduce 1.27% compared with 2005, age group 15–64 years keeps the same as in 2005 |
| Education | Junior high school or over keeps increasing, primary education reduces slightly |
| Ethnic nationality | Compared with 2005, Han nationality increases 4.41%, Minority increases 9.63% |
| Residential status | Urban living increases from 58.05% to 61.14%, so rural living is 38.86% in 2010 |
Figure 2Match the medical insured with the population sample.
Figure 3Variables on population census sample and medical insurance participants file.
Matching variables.
| Variables | Groups | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | 2 | Male, female |
| Age group | 6 | 15–24, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65 and over |
| Employment status | 2 | Employee, retiree |
| Marital status | 3 | Never married, married, divorced, or other |
Figure 4Trends of age groups over the period of 2000–2010. (a) indicates the numbers of the various age groups of population; (b) indicates the percentage of each age group.
Estimated distribution of insured employees and retirees over 2005–2010.
| Year | Number of population | Percentage | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | Province | Senior | Total | City | Province | Senior | Total | |
| 2005 | 793453 | 283435 | 4403 | 1081290 | 73.38 | 26.21 | 0.41 | 100.00 |
| 2008 | 885397 | 315574 | 3935 | 1204906 | 73.48 | 26.19 | 0.33 | 100.00 |
| 2009 | 909780 | 324153 | 3774 | 1237706 | 73.51 | 26.19 | 0.30 | 100.00 |
| 2010 | 934643 | 332896 | 3610 | 1271149 | 73.53 | 26.19 | 0.28 | 100.00 |
Notes: City means under Municipal administration; Province means under Provincial administration; Senior means senior retirees.
Forecast population distribution of employed and residents.
| Year | Insured | Uninsured | Residents* | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employed | Retired | Employed | Unemployed | Retired | |||
| Population | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 2005 | 720938 | 360352 | 1115677 | 67976 | 116664 | 1128020 | 3441651 |
| 2008 | 803247 | 401659 | 1140241 | 70330 | 145995 | 1186056 | 3677198 |
| 2009 | 825088 | 412619 | 1147621 | 71063 | 156523 | 1206081 | 3747932 |
| 2010 | 847360 | 423788 | 1154660 | 71766 | 167456 | 1226169 | 3819434 |
|
| |||||||
| Percentage | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 2005 | 20.95 | 10.47 | 32.42 | 1.98 | 3.39 | 32.78 | 100.00 |
| 2008 | 21.84 | 10.92 | 31.01 | 1.91 | 3.97 | 32.25 | 100.00 |
| 2009 | 22.01 | 11.01 | 30.62 | 1.90 | 4.18 | 32.18 | 100.00 |
| 2010 | 22.19 | 11.10 | 30.23 | 1.88 | 4.38 | 32.10 | 100.00 |
Note: * Residents who are not in the labour force.
Forecast population and percentage of urban residents out of labour market.
| Year | Adults | Children | Uni-students | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General | Concession | General | Concession | General | Concession | ||
| Population | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 2005 | 264146 | 82409 | 617370 | 17949 | 144026 | 2121 | 1128020 |
| 2008 | 274085 | 88013 | 651795 | 18911 | 150829 | 2423 | 1186056 |
| 2009 | 277363 | 89958 | 663919 | 19240 | 153071 | 2530 | 1206081 |
| 2010 | 280606 | 91931 | 676264 | 19569 | 155160 | 2639 | 1226169 |
|
| |||||||
| Percentage | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 2005 | 23.42 | 7.31 | 54.73 | 1.59 | 12.77 | 0.19 | 100.00 |
| 2008 | 23.11 | 7.42 | 54.95 | 1.59 | 12.72 | 0.20 | 100.00 |
| 2009 | 23.00 | 7.46 | 55.05 | 1.60 | 12.69 | 0.21 | 100.00 |
| 2010 | 22.88 | 7.50 | 55.15 | 1.60 | 12.65 | 0.22 | 100.00 |
Figure 5Forecast percentage of age groups of adult residents. (a) for general residents and (b) for concession residents.
Figure 6Estimated average annual family income by quintile over 2005–2010.