| Literature DB >> 22481877 |
Andiara Silos Moraes de Castro E Souza1, Carolina Isabel Miño, Silvia Nassif Del Lama.
Abstract
We screened 44 heterologous microsatellites isolated in species of the families Threskiornithidae, Ciconiidae and Ardeidae for their use in a migratory waterbird, the white-faced ibis Plegadis chihi (Vieillot, 1817) (Threskiornithidae). Of the screened loci, 57% amplified successfully and 24% were polymorphic. In two breeding colonies from southern Brazil (N = 131) we detected 32 alleles (2-10 alleles/locus). Average He over all loci and colonies was 0.55, and the combined probability of excluding false parents, 98%. There was no departure from HWE in any loci or population. Eru6 and Eru4 loci were in non-random association in the Alvorada colony, and NnNF5 and Eru5 in both populations. AMOVA analysis indicated that most of the genetic diversity was contained within populations. Structure analysis suggested a single population, and F(ST) value showed weak genetic structuring (F(ST) = 0.009, p = 0.05). The two populations are apparently connected through gene-flow. The panel of six microsatellites optimized here was sufficiently informative for characterizing the genetic diversity and structure in these natural populations of the white-faced ibis. The information generated could be useful in future studies of genetic diversity, relatedness and the mating system in Plegadis chihi and related species.Entities:
Keywords: SSR; cross-species amplification; genetic diversity; molecular markers; white-faced ibis
Year: 2012 PMID: 22481877 PMCID: PMC3313519 DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572012005000018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Mol Biol ISSN: 1415-4757 Impact factor: 1.771
Basic information on the microsatellite markers screened in this study. Summary information on the heterologous microsatellite loci screened in a pooled sample of 20 individuals of the white-faced ibis Plegadis chihi from each of two Brazilian colonies. Superscripts in locus names refer to references of the original primer description and PCR cycling parameters, detailed in the table footnote.
| Locus | Repetitive unit | AT (°C) | Reverse primer volume (μL)/concentration (μM) in PCR | Forward primer volume (μL)/concentration (μM) in PCR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaju3 | (GAT)13 | 55/53 | 0.6/2.5 | 0.6/2.5 | 0.76 |
| Aaju5 | (GAT)16(TAT)4 | 58/55 | 0.6/2.6 | 0.6/2.6 | ML |
| NnNF5 | (TAGA)2TA(CA)8 | 57/57 | 1.0/0.4 | 2.5/10.5 | 0.35 |
| NnCE11 | (CTG)8 | 59/56 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | ML |
| NnDD9 | (GT)8 | 59/54 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | ML |
| NnHB12 | (CAT)7 | 59/56 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | ML |
| Eru2 | (GA)7(A)4(GA)10 | 53/53 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | 0.38 |
| Eru3 | (AG)21 | 53/53 | 0.5/2.5 | 1.25/6.25 | ML |
| Eru4 | (TC)11(C)3(TC)9 | 62.5/54 | 0.5/2.5 | 1.25/6.25 | 0.37 |
| Eru5 | (CA)15(AT)2(CA)3 | 65/62 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | 0.53 |
| Eru6 | (CT)20 | 57/54 | 0.5/2.5 | 1.25/6.25 | 0.59 |
| Eru7 | (CT)6AG(CT)6TC(CT)10 | 62.5/60 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | ML |
| Eru8 | (GA)8GCAAGT(GA)9 | 63/63 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | ML |
| Eru9 | (GA)24 | 62.5/54 | 0.5/2.5 | 1.25/6.25 | ML |
| Eru11 | (GAAGA)18 | 62.5/63 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | ML |
| WS3 | (AG)10 | 60/58 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.8/4.0 | ML |
| WS4 | (GT)15 | 60/58 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.8/4.0 | ML |
| WS9 | (AAC)7 | 60/58 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.8/4.0 | ML |
| Bi1 | (GT)11 | 57/57 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | ML |
| Bi5 | (TTTG)4 | 56/54 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | ML |
| Bi7 | (TA)5 | 56/52 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | ML |
| Bi9 | (CT)4(TTC)2(TC)4 | 58/58 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | ML |
| Bi10 | (AC)5AA(AC)4 | 58/54 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | ML |
| Bi11 | (GT)4 | 60/55 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | ML |
| Bi12 | (CA)4(TC)2 | 59/59 | 0.8/4.0 | 0.2/1.0 | ML |
Source species:
Platalea ajaja (Sawyer, 2002, PhD Thesis, Univ. North Texas);
Nipponia nippon (Ji );
Eudocimus ruber (Santos );
Mycteria americana (Tomasulo-Seccomandi );
Bubulcus íbis (Campanini ).
An asterisk (*) to locus names indicates polymorphism in the studied sample.
AT: Annealing temperature in the original species/in P. chihi. PIC: polymorphic information content, ML: monomorphic locus.
Levels of genetic diversity in Plegadi chihi. Population genetic parameters for two Brazilian breeding-colonies of the white-faced ibis, estimated based on six heterologous microsatellite loci.
| Colony | Locus | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvorada | Aaju3 | 44 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 8.83 | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.87 |
| Eru2 | 37 | 0.49 | 0.39 | 4.00 | 0.70 | 0.39 | 1.00 | |
| Eru4 | 44 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 2.84 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.76 | |
| Eru5 | 44 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 3.00 | 0.04 | 0.64 | 0.91 | |
| Eru6 | 44 | 0.48 | 0.64 | 7.50 | 0.10 | 0.65 | 0.004 | |
| NnNF5 | 44 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 2.00 | 0.18 | 0.42 | 0.96 | |
| Mean | - | 0.58 | 0.55 | 4.70 | 0.41 | 0.56 | 0.86 | |
| Tapes | Aaju3 | 87 | 0.84 | 0.78 | 9.37 | 0.11 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| Eru2 | 84 | 0.56 | 0.44 | 2.69 | 0.06 | 0.44 | 1.00 | |
| Eru4 | 87 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 3.48 | 0.34 | 0.53 | 0.11 | |
| Eru5 | 86 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 3.00 | 0.06 | 0.59 | 0.20 | |
| Eru6 | 86 | 0.51 | 0.60 | 6.00 | 0.06 | 0.60 | 0.02 | |
| NnNF5 | 84 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 2.00 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.86 | |
| Mean | - | 0.56 | 0.56 | 4.42 | 0.17 | 0.56 | 0.54 | |
| Overall mean | - | 0.57 | 0.55 | 4.56 | 0.29 | 0.56 | 0.60 | |
Non-significant after sequential Bonferroni correction (p > 0.05).
N: Number of samples genotyped, Ho: Observed heterozygosity, He: Expected heterozygosity, Ra: Allelic richness, P: Probability values for tests of departure from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium, DG: Gene diversity, F: In-breeding coefficient.
Heterozygosity in seven aquatic-bird species. Comparison of average expected heterozygosity (H) values observed in seven species of aquatic birds analyzed using microsatellite markers.
| Species | Reference | |
|---|---|---|
| Wood stork ( | 0.37 | |
| Wood stork ( | 0.44 | |
| White-faced Ibis ( | 0.55 | This study |
| Jabiru stork ( | 0.55 | |
| Great egret ( | 0.58 | |
| Great Blue Heron | 0.59 | Eo |
| Roseate spoonbill ( | 0.61 | |
| Great Cormorant ( | 0.73 | Eo |
The study by Miño refers to nine microsatellite loci, whereas that by Van Den Bussche refers to four loci, also mentioned in Eo et al. (2010).
Original reference: McGuire and Noor (2002).
Original references: Goostrey and Piertney .