Purpose:The aim of this study was to characterize the pathogenesis of low bone mineral density in glycogen storage disease type Ia and Ib. Methods: A retrospective chart review performed at the University of Florida Glycogen Storage Disease Program included patients with glycogen storage disease type Ia and Ib for whom dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis was performed. A Z-score less than -2 SD was considered low. Analysis for association of bone mineral density with age, gender, presence of complications, mean triglyceride and 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, duration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy, and history of corticosteroid use was performed. Results: In glycogen storage disease Ia, 23/42 patients (55%) had low bone mineral density. Low bone mineral density was associated with other disease complications (P = 0.02) and lower mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration (P = 0.03). There was a nonsignificant trend toward lower mean triglyceride concentration in the normal bone mineral density group (P = 0.1).In patients with glycogen storage disease type Ib, 8/12 (66.7%) had low bone mineral density. We did not detect an association with duration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy (P = 0.68), mean triglyceride level (P = 0.267), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P = 0.3), or 25-hydroxyvitamin D (P = 0.63) concentration, and there was no evidence that corticosteroid therapy was associated with lower bone mineral density (P = 1). Conclusion: In glycogen storage disease type Ia, bone mineral density is associated with other complications and 25-hydroxyvitamin D status. In glycogen storage disease type Ib, bone mineral density was not associated with any covariates analyzed, suggesting multifactorial etiology or reflecting a small sample.Genet Med advance online publication 5 April 2012.
Purpose:The aim of this study was to characterize the pathogenesis of low bone mineral density in glycogen storage disease type Ia and Ib. Methods: A retrospective chart review performed at the University of Florida Glycogen Storage Disease Program included patients with glycogen storage disease type Ia and Ib for whom dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis was performed. A Z-score less than -2 SD was considered low. Analysis for association of bone mineral density with age, gender, presence of complications, mean triglyceride and 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, duration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy, and history of corticosteroid use was performed. Results: In glycogen storage disease Ia, 23/42 patients (55%) had low bone mineral density. Low bone mineral density was associated with other disease complications (P = 0.02) and lower mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration (P = 0.03). There was a nonsignificant trend toward lower mean triglyceride concentration in the normal bone mineral density group (P = 0.1).In patients with glycogen storage disease type Ib, 8/12 (66.7%) had low bone mineral density. We did not detect an association with duration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy (P = 0.68), mean triglyceride level (P = 0.267), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P = 0.3), or 25-hydroxyvitamin D (P = 0.63) concentration, and there was no evidence that corticosteroid therapy was associated with lower bone mineral density (P = 1). Conclusion: In glycogen storage disease type Ia, bone mineral density is associated with other complications and 25-hydroxyvitamin D status. In glycogen storage disease type Ib, bone mineral density was not associated with any covariates analyzed, suggesting multifactorial etiology or reflecting a small sample.Genet Med advance online publication 5 April 2012.
Authors: Suhrad G Banugaria; Stephanie L Austin; Anne Boney; Thomas J Weber; Priya S Kishnani Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: Daniëlle H J Martens; Jan Peter Rake; Gerjan Navis; Vaclav Fidler; Catharina M L van Dael; G Peter A Smit Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Gyongyi O Okechuku; Lawrence R Shoemaker; Monika Dambska; Laurie M Brown; Justin Mathew; David A Weinstein Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 4.982
Authors: Katalin M Ross; Laurie M Brown; Michelle M Corrado; Tayoot Chengsupanimit; Latravia M Curry; Iris A Ferrecchia; Laura Y Porras; Justin T Mathew; David A Weinstein Journal: JIMD Rep Date: 2015-08-25
Authors: Elizabeth D Brooks; Dustin J Landau; Jeffrey I Everitt; Talmage T Brown; Kylie M Grady; Lauren Waskowicz; Cameron R Bass; John D'Angelo; Yohannes G Asfaw; Kyha Williams; Priya S Kishnani; Dwight D Koeberl Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 4.982
Authors: Laurie A Tsilianidis; Laurie M Fiske; Sara Siegel; Chris Lumpkin; Kate Hoyt; Melissa Wasserstein; David A Weinstein Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: Terry G J Derks; David F Rodriguez-Buritica; Ayesha Ahmad; Foekje de Boer; María L Couce; Sarah C Grünert; Philippe Labrune; Nerea López Maldonado; Carolina Fischinger Moura de Souza; Rebecca Riba-Wolman; Alessandro Rossi; Heather Saavedra; Rupal Naik Gupta; Vassili Valayannopoulos; John Mitchell Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-10-27 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Irene J Hoogeveen; Fabian Peeks; Foekje de Boer; Charlotte M A Lubout; Tom J de Koning; Sebastiaan Te Boekhorst; Robert-Jan Zandvoort; Rob Burghard; Francjan J van Spronsen; Terry G J Derks Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 4.982