Literature DB >> 22480954

Who should be really considered as a poor mobilizer in the plerixafor era?

Giovanna Andreola1, Anna Vanazzi, Davide Radice, Aleksandra Babic, Cristina Rabascio, Mara Negri, Giovanni Martinelli, Daniele Laszlo.   

Abstract

Patients with a number of peripheral CD34+ cells ≥20/μL have recently been defined in the literature as "poor mobilizers". We retrospectively reviewed medical records from a total of 248 patients affected by hematological malignancies or solid tumors undergoing peripheral blood stem cell collection following chemotherapy plus G-CSF. On the basis of the CD34+ cell peak in peripheral blood following mobilization therapy, patients were defined as good mobilizers (group A, CD34+ cells ≥20/μL), relative poor mobilizers (group B, CD34+ cells <20 and ≥8/μL) and absolute poor mobilizers (group C, CD34+ cells <8/μL). One hundred and seventy-seven (71%) patients resulted good mobilizers, 35 (14%) patients relative poor mobilizers and 36 (15%) patients absolute poor mobilizers. Target of stem cell collection was ≥2.0×10(6) CD34+cells/kg for each transplantation procedure. All patients in group A, 20 patients in group B (57%) and 1 patient in group C (2.7%) were able to collect ≥2.0×10(6) CD34+cells/kg. The multivariate analysis confirmed that more than three lines of previous chemotherapy and a previous autologous PBSC transplantation negatively affect mobilization of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood. Our data suggest that a number of CD34+ cells ≥20/μL does not always result in a failed stem cell collection and in fact in our patient series more than 70% of the patients defined as poor mobilizers have indeed collected the minimum number of 2.0×10(6) CD34+cells/kg required for a successful transplantation. The use of new agent such as CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor might further improve mobilization efficacy in such patients.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22480954     DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2012.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci        ISSN: 1473-0502            Impact factor:   1.764


  4 in total

Review 1.  Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell harvesting: technical advances and clinical utility.

Authors:  Olivier Hequet
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2015-02-18

2.  Predicting poor peripheral blood stem cell collection in patients with multiple myeloma receiving pre-transplant induction therapy with novel agents and mobilized with cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor: results from a Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto Multiple Myeloma Working Party study.

Authors:  Pellegrino Musto; Vittorio Simeon; Alberto Grossi; Francesca Gay; Sara Bringhen; Alessandra Larocca; Roberto Guariglia; Giuseppe Pietrantuono; Oreste Villani; Giovanni D'Arena; Carmela Cuomo; Clelia Musto; Fortunato Morabito; Maria Teresa Petrucci; Massimo Offidani; Elena Zamagni; Paola Tacchetti; Concetta Conticello; Giuseppe Milone; Antonio Palumbo; Michele Cavo; Mario Boccadoro
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 6.832

3.  Chemotherapy-based versus chemotherapy-free stem cell mobilization (± plerixafor) in multiple myeloma patients: an Italian cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Luca Castagna; Francesco Lanza; Daniele Laszlo; Giuseppe Milone; Luca Pierelli; Riccardo Saccardi; Carlo Lazzaro
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.174

4.  Correlation of Body Mass Index and Proinflammatory Cytokine Levels with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization.

Authors:  Tso-Fu Wang; Yu-Shan Liou; Hsin-Hou Chang; Shang-Hsien Yang; Chi-Cheng Li; Jen-Hung Wang; Der-Shan Sun
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.