Literature DB >> 22480865

One-year prospective comparative study of three large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip prostheses: serum metal ion levels and clinical outcomes.

J-F Lardanchet1, J Taviaux, D Arnalsteen, A Gabrion, P Mertl.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The good clinical outcomes and low wear obtained with 28-mm metal-on-metal implants for total hip replacement prompted the development of large-diameter heads that more closely replicated the normal hip anatomy, with the goal of improving prosthesis stability. However, the blood release of metal ions due to wear at the bearing surfaces and the high rate of groin pain seen with large-diameter implants are causing concern. To determine whether these events are related to the geometry and metal composition of the prosthesis components, we conducted a prospective study of clinical outcomes and serum chromium and cobalt levels 1 year after implantation of three different acetabular cups. HYPOTHESIS: Serum levels of metal ions are comparable with different types of large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip prostheses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared 24 Durom™ cups (D), 23 M2a Magnum™ cups (M2a), and 20 Conserve Total™ (C) cups regarding serum chromium and cobalt levels, Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) scores and Oxford Hip Scores (OHS), as well as radiographic cup orientation and position at 1-year follow-up. Mean age was 66 years (45-85 years), mean body mass index was 28 Kg/m(2) (18-45), patients were almost equally divided between males and females, and the reason for hip replacement was primary hip osteoarthritis in 65 patients and avascular necrosis in two. Metal ions were assayed in serum from blood drawn through non-metallic catheters, using mass spectrometry.
RESULTS: Dislocation occurred in two patients (one D and one M2a) and revision to change the bearing couple was required in two patients in the D group. Serum cobalt levels in the C group were significantly higher (P=0. 0003) than in the two other groups (7.5 μg/L versus 2. 7 μg/L with D and 2. 2 μg/L with M2a). Clinical outcomes were better in the M2a group (PMA, 17.7 [16-18]; and OHS, 15.2 [12-30]; P<0.05). The PMA score and OHS were 17.5 (16-18) and 18.2 (12-42), respectively, with D; and 16.75 (10-18) and 22. 2 (12-42), respectively, with C cups. When all three cup models were pooled, serum ion levels were higher in patients with pain than without pain (chromium, 7.1 μg/L versus 2.1 μg/L [P=0.002], and cobalt, 8 μg/L versus 2.6 μg/L [P=0.0004]). DISCUSSION: Serum chrome and cobalt levels increased after metal-on-metal total hip replacement, and the increase was greater with large-diameter implants than previously reported with 28-mm implants. Persistent pain was significantly associated with higher metal ion levels, with a probable cobalt cut-off of about 8 μg/L. Differences in modular head-neck concepts may explain the observed variations.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22480865     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  13 in total

1.  Large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: dislocation infrequent but survivorship poor.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Michael J Morris; Joanne B Adams; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Long-term survival analysis of cementless large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Elli Holappa; Jukka Kettunen; Hannu Miettinen; Heikki Kröger; Simo Miettinen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 3.  Diagnosis and management of implant debris-associated inflammation.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Jiri Gallo; Emmanuel Gibon; Michiaki Takagi
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Adverse reaction to metal debris after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mika Junnila; Matti Seppänen; Jari Mokka; Petri Virolainen; Tuukka Pölönen; Tero Vahlberg; Kimmo Mattila; Esa K J Tuominen; Juho Rantakokko; Ville Äärimaa; Ari Itälä; Keijo T Mäkelä
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Adverse reaction to metal debris after ReCap-M2A-Magnum large-diameter-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jari Mokka; Mika Junnila; Matti Seppänen; Petri Virolainen; Tuukka Pölönen; Tero Vahlberg; Kimmo Mattila; Esa K J Tuominen; Juho Rantakokko; Ville Aärimaa; Juha Kukkonen; Keijo T Mäkelä
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Indications for lumbar total disc replacement: selecting the right patient with the right indication for the right total disc.

Authors:  Karin Büttner-Janz; Richard D Guyer; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

Review 7.  Chromium and cobalt ion concentrations in blood and serum following various types of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a literature overview.

Authors:  Christopher Jantzen; Henrik L Jørgensen; Benn R Duus; Sune L Sporring; Jes B Lauritzen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Does bearing size influence metal ion levels in large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty? A comparison of three total hip systems.

Authors:  James Smith; David Lee; Kamal Bali; Pam Railton; David Kinniburgh; Peter Faris; Deborah Marshall; Brian Burkart; James Powell
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  High Re-Operation Rates Using Conserve Metal-On-Metal Total Hip Articulations.

Authors:  S L Mogensen; T Jakobsen; H Christoffersen; N Krarup
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-03-29

Review 10.  Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements--The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Olli Lainiala; Petra Elo; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.