Literature DB >> 2248005

Reaction times for hand movements made in response to visual versus vibratory cues.

R J Nelson1, C A McCandlish, V D Douglas.   

Abstract

Reaction times were determined for monkeys and humans who made wrist flexion and extension movements in response to vibratory and visual cues. Humans initiated movements approximately 50 msec sooner in response to vibratory as compared to visual cues. For monkeys, this difference was approximately 100 msec. Mean daily reaction times for monkeys and humans improved with practice until they reached a steady level of performance. Increased differences between vibratory and visual reaction times were weakly correlated with increased age of humans. The increase in the differences appeared to result from decreased reaction times by older subjects for vibratory-cued movements; reaction times for visually cued movements did not consistently vary across the age range of subjects tested (19-36 years). The results obtained using this novel paradigm suggest that it may be a useful tool for simultaneously testing behavioral performance or neurological function during somatosensorimotor and visuomotor tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2248005     DOI: 10.3109/08990229009144712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res        ISSN: 0899-0220            Impact factor:   1.111


  8 in total

1.  Striatal neuronal activity during the initiation and execution of hand movements made in response to visual and vibratory cues.

Authors:  T W Gardiner; R J Nelson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neuronal activity in primary motor cortex differs when monkeys perform somatosensory and visually guided wrist movements.

Authors:  Yu Liu; John M Denton; Randall J Nelson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neuronal activity in monkey primary somatosensory cortex is related to expectation of somatosensory and visual go-cues.

Authors:  Yu Liu; John M Denton; Randall J Nelson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Monkey primary somatosensory cortical activity during the early reaction time period differs with cues that guide movements.

Authors:  Yu Liu; John M Denton; Randall J Nelson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hijacking cortical motor output with repetitive microstimulation.

Authors:  Darcy M Griffin; Heather M Hudson; Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf; Paul D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Microstimulation activates a handful of muscle synergies.

Authors:  Simon A Overduin; Andrea d'Avella; Jose M Carmena; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Multisensory GPS impact on spatial representation in an immersive virtual reality driving game.

Authors:  Laura Seminati; Jacob Hadnett-Hunter; Richard Joiner; Karin Petrini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Differential experiences of embodiment between body-powered and myoelectric prosthesis users.

Authors:  Susannah M Engdahl; Sean K Meehan; Deanna H Gates
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.