Literature DB >> 22479135

Resource quality or competition: why increase resource acceptance in the presence of conspecifics?

Jeremy M Davis1, César R Nufio, Daniel R Papaj.   

Abstract

Some animal species increase resource acceptance rates in the presence of conspecifics. Such responses may be adaptive if the presence of conspecifics is a reliable indicator of resource quality. Similarly, these responses could represent an adaptive reduction in choosiness under high levels of scramble competition. Although high resource quality and high levels of scramble competition should both favor increased resource acceptance, the contexts in which the increase occurs should differ. In this paper, we tested the effect of social environment on egg-laying and aggressive behavior in the walnut fly, Rhagoletis juglandis, in multiple contexts to determine whether increased resource acceptance in the presence of conspecifics was better viewed as a response to increased host quality or increased competition. We found that grouped females oviposit more readily than isolated females when provided small (low-quality) artificial hosts but not when provided large (high-quality) artificial hosts, indicating that conspecific presence reduces choosiness. Increased resource acceptance was observed even when exposure to conspecifics was temporally or spatially separate from exposure to the resource. Finally, we found that individuals showed reduced aggression after being housed in groups, as expected under high levels of scramble competition. These results indicate that the pattern of resource acceptance in the presence of conspecifics may be better viewed as a response to increased scramble competition rather than as a response to public information about resource quality.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22479135      PMCID: PMC3117901          DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arr042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Ecol        ISSN: 1045-2249            Impact factor:   2.671


  10 in total

Review 1.  Joining and avoidance behavior in nonsocial insects.

Authors:  R J Prokopy; B D Roitberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  A direct effect of competition on food choice by pigeons.

Authors: 
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Superparasitism of larval hosts by the walnut fly, Rhagoletis juglandis, and its implications for female and offspring performance.

Authors:  César R Nufio; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution.

Authors:  Etienne Danchin; Luc-Alain Giraldeau; Thomas J Valone; Richard H Wagner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Sasha R X Dall; Luc-Alain Giraldeau; Ola Olsson; John M McNamara; David W Stephens
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 6.  Patterns of variation in the influence of natal experience on habitat choice.

Authors:  Jeremy M Davis
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.875

Review 7.  Superparasitism as an adaptive strategy for insect parasitoids.

Authors:  J J van Alphen; M E Visser
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 19.686

8.  The effects of conspecific attraction and habitat quality on habitat selection in territorial birds (Troglodytes aedon).

Authors:  K L Muller; J A Stamps; V V Krishnan; N H Willits
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Social influences of competition on impulsive choices in domestic chicks.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Amita; Ai Kawamori; Toshiya Matsushima
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Intraspecific larval competition in the olive fruit fly (Diptera: tephritidae).

Authors:  Hannah Joy Burrack; Angela M Fornell; Joseph H Connell; Neil V O'Connell; Phil A Phillips; Paul M Vossen; Frank G Zalom
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.377

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  A nonlinear relationship between genetic diversity and productivity in a polyphagous seed beetle.

Authors:  K J Burls; J Shapiro; M L Forister; G A Hoelzer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Testing the potential contribution of Wolbachia to speciation when cytoplasmic incompatibility becomes associated with host-related reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Daniel J Bruzzese; Hannes Schuler; Thomas M Wolfe; Mary M Glover; Joseph V Mastroni; Meredith M Doellman; Cheyenne Tait; Wee L Yee; Juan Rull; Martin Aluja; Glen Ray Hood; Robert B Goughnour; Christian Stauffer; Patrik Nosil; Jeffery L Feder
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.622

3.  Risk of predation makes foragers less choosy about their food.

Authors:  Alice Charalabidis; François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont; Sandrine Petit; David A Bohan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Plastic responses of males and females interact to determine mating behavior.

Authors:  Emily K Fowler; Stewart Leigh; Amanda Bretman; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.171

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.