| Literature DB >> 22478392 |
Abstract
Traditional critics of behaviorism and behavior analysis have emphasized that these approaches cannot deal with creative achievements in the arts or sciences, or even in ordinary speech. This essay explores several lines of research and conceptual issues from different sources in an effort to refute this claim. The emphasis is on scientific and mathematical creativity. Some of the topics considered include the role of special practice and manipulation, conditions for development of automaticity, the interplay of contingency-controlled and rule-governed behavior, modeling, abstraction, intuition, the blending of response units, and emergent behavior. Some limitations of a behavioral account are also considered.Year: 2003 PMID: 22478392 PMCID: PMC2731446 DOI: 10.1007/bf03392065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Anal ISSN: 0738-6729