Literature DB >> 22477336

Semantic similarity influences early morphological priming in Serbian: a challenge to form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition.

Laurie Beth Feldman1, Aleksandar Kostić, Vasilije Gvozdenović, Patrick A O'Connor, Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín.   

Abstract

Semantically similar (e.g., coolant-COOL) primes have produced greater facilitation than have form-similar but semantically dissimilar (e.g., rampant-RAMP) primes when English words have appeared in the forward-masked primed lexical decision task (Feldman, O'Connor, & Moscoso del Prado Martín, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16: 684-691, 2009). These results challenge claims that form-based, semantically blind activation underlies early morphological facilitation. Some have argued that the English materials in previous studies were not ideally constructed, insofar as the types of spelling changes to affixed stems differed in the semantically similar and dissimilar pairs. The present study exploited Serbian's bialphabetism, rich morphology, and homographic (form-identical) stems to replicate early effects of semantic similarity. Furthermore, it incorporated within-target manipulations of prime type and of alphabet, such that the alphabets of the prime-target pairs matched in Experiment 1a and alternated in Experiment 1b. Importantly, no letter or phoneme changes occurred between the stems of the primes and targets. These results revealed significant effects of semantic similarity that are comparable with and without alphabet alternation. The semantic effects in Serbian replicated almost exactly those in English (Feldman et al., Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16: 684-691, 2009), which suggests that even early in the course of processing, morphemes are units of meaning as well as of form. The results failed to support models of lexical processing that postulate sequential access, first to the morphological form, and then to the semantic aspects of words.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22477336      PMCID: PMC3696079          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0250-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

Review 1.  Words in the brain's language.

Authors:  F Pulvermüller
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Morphological priming: the role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position.

Authors:  L B Feldman; E G Soltano
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Does LGHT prime DARK? Masked associative priming with addition neighbors.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Pablo Gomez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

4.  The broth in my brother's brothel: morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Kathleen Rastle; Matthew H Davis; Boris New
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

5.  List context fosters semantic processing: parallels between semantic and morphological facilitation when primes are forward masked.

Authors:  Laurie Beth Feldman; Dana M Basnight-Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning.

Authors:  R Harald Baayen; Petar Milin; Dusica Filipović Đurđević; Peter Hendrix; Marco Marelli
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Repetition priming is not purely episodic in origin.

Authors:  L B Feldman; J Moskovljević
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Are CORNER and BROTHER Morphologically Complex? Not in the Long Term.

Authors:  Jay G Rueckl; Karen Aicher
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2008-11-13

9.  Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: a violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition.

Authors:  Laurie Beth Feldman; Patrick A O'Connor; Fermín Moscoso Del Prado Martín
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

10.  Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis.

Authors:  Laurie B Feldman; Petar Milin; Kit W Cho; Fermín Moscoso Del Prado Martín; Patrick A O'Connor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

1.  The role of phonology in processing morphologically complex words.

Authors:  Rongchao Tang; Naoko Witzel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

2.  Testing the stem dominance hypothesis: meaning analysis of inflected words and prepositional phrases.

Authors:  Minna Lehtonen; Gabor Harrer; Erling Wande; Matti Laine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis.

Authors:  Laurie B Feldman; Petar Milin; Kit W Cho; Fermín Moscoso Del Prado Martín; Patrick A O'Connor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Letter chunk frequency does not explain morphological masked priming : Affix frequency in masked priming.

Authors:  Mara De Rosa; Davide Crepaldi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-11-05

5.  Masked Morphological Priming and Sensitivity to the Statistical Structure of Form-to-Meaning Mapping in L2.

Authors:  Eva Viviani; Davide Crepaldi
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-05-09

6.  The Form of Morphemes: MEG Evidence From Masked Priming of Two Hebrew Templates.

Authors:  Itamar Kastner; Liina Pylkkänen; Alec Marantz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.