Literature DB >> 22476755

Use of magnetic resonance imaging in detection of breast cancer recurrence: a systematic review.

Edel Marie Quinn1, Andrew Peter Coveney, Henry Paul Redmond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence can be difficult as a result of the presence of scar tissue in the breast. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be superior to traditional imaging in diagnosis of recurrence because of its ability to differentiate malignancy from scarring. Current guidelines on investigation of suspected breast cancer recurrence recommend MRI when other investigations have equivocal findings. We performed the first systematic review on this topic.
METHODS: Literature search revealed 35 potentially relevant studies; 10 were included in final analysis. Included were clinical studies comparing MRI with another diagnostic modality for diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence, with at least 10 patients, in the English language. Data extraction focused on sensitivity and specificity of standard diagnostic modalities and MRI for diagnosis of local disease recurrence.
RESULTS: In total 494 patients were assessed across 10 studies; all were case series. Sensitivity of MRI for detection of recurrence ranged 75-100 %, while specificity ranged 66.6-100 %. Both sensitivity and specificity increased when MRI was performed after a longer time interval from the original surgery, although the longest follow-up reported was only 36 months. A negative MRI can avoid the need for further biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: Available data are based on clinically heterogeneous case series and superiority over standard triple assessment for breast cancer recurrence has not been proven. At present, MRI cannot be recommended in the routine diagnostic assessment for breast cancer recurrence but has a potentially useful role as a second-line investigation. A negative MRI is more useful than a positive MRI as positive MRIs require further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22476755     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2341-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  10 in total

Review 1.  Surveillance for second breast cancer events in women with a personal history of breast cancer using breast MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cameron B Haas; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Janie M Lee; Sara H Javid; Mary Bush; Dianne Johnson; Timothy Gleason; Cary Kaufman; Jennifer Specht; Sean Stitham; Karen J Wernli
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Direct Regularization From Co-Registered Contrast MRI Improves Image Quality of MRI-Guided Near-Infrared Spectral Tomography of Breast Lesions.

Authors:  Limin Zhang; Shudong Jiang; Yan Zhao; Jinchao Feng; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Breast Cancer in the Elderly: Is MRI Helpful?

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Allison Hirsch; Anne Eaton; Michelle Stempel; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 4.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Breast Oncoplastic Surgery: An Update.

Authors:  Silvia Gigli; Maria I Amabile; Francesca Di Pastena; Lucia Manganaro; Emanuele David; Massimo Monti; Valerio DʼOrazi; Carlo Catalano; Laura Ballesio
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Rapid increase in breast magnetic resonance imaging use: trends from 2000 to 2011.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Lingling Li; Elisabeth S Malin; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Diana S M Buist; Marjorie A Rosenberg; Marina Alfisher; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 6.  Current approaches and challenges in early detection of breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Erika J Schneble; Lindsey J Graham; Matthew P Shupe; Frederick L Flynt; Kevin P Banks; Aaron D Kirkpatrick; Aviram Nissan; Leonard Henry; Alexander Stojadinovic; Nathan M Shumway; Itzhak Avital; George E Peoples; Robert F Setlik
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 7.  Current approaches and challenges in monitoring treatment responses in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lindsey J Graham; Matthew P Shupe; Erika J Schneble; Frederick L Flynt; Michael N Clemenshaw; Aaron D Kirkpatrick; Chris Gallagher; Aviram Nissan; Leonard Henry; Alexander Stojadinovic; George E Peoples; Nathan M Shumway
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 8.  Imaging surveillance of patients with breast cancer after primary treatment: current recommendations.

Authors:  Jung Hyun Yoon; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Fat necrosis in the Breast: A systematic review of clinical.

Authors:  Narges Vasei; Azita Shishegar; Forouzan Ghalkhani; Mohammad Darvishi
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  MRI surveillance for women with a personal history of breast cancer: comparison between abbreviated and full diagnostic protocol.

Authors:  Ko Woon Park; Sol Bee Han; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Sook Ko; Ji Soo Choi; Sun Jung Rhee; Eun Young Ko
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.039

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.