Literature DB >> 2247667

Reproducibility of methacholine induced bronchoconstriction in healthy subjects: the use of area under the expiratory flow-volume curve to express results.

O P Seppälä1.   

Abstract

The usefulness of the pulmonary function variable, area under the expiratory flow-volume curve (AEFV), in methacholine provocation (MP) studies in normal subjects was evaluated. The baseline coefficients of variation (CV), maximal fall from post-saline values (MAX) and dose-response slope [DRS = maximal percentage fall in pulmonary function/maximal noncumulative methacholine dose (mumol)] were calculated for AEFV, and were compared to those of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), maximum expiratory flow at 50% (MEF50%) and at 25% (MEF25%). Also the repeatability after 2 and 8 weeks was assessed. The rank order of CVs was FEV1 less than AEFV less than MEF50% approximately MEF25% all differences, except MEF50% vs. MEF25%, being significant (P less than 0.05). The order of sensitivities (estimated with MAX and DRS) was FEV1 less than AEFV less than MEF50% less than MEF25%. Again, all differences were significant (AEFV vs. MEF50% P less than 0.01, others P less than 0.001). After two weeks the correlation coefficients for MAX- and DRS-values of AEFV were 0.84 and 0.94 (P less than 0.001), respectively. After an eight week period the correlations were still high, 0.86 and 0.92 (P less than 0.001), respectively, but the actual MAX- and DRS-values tended to be smaller than eight weeks before. The repeatability of MAX of AEFV was not quite as high as that of FEV1. On the other hand, the correlations of DRS-value derived from AEFV were markedly better than those derived from FEV1. In conclusion, MP in normal subjects is well repeatable at least within two weeks, but after an eight week period disturbing factors may intervene reducing repeatability. AEFV can be considered at least as good a pulmonary function variable as FEV1 in demonstrating bronchoconstriction during MPs in normal subjects, and it might even be a better variable to obtain DRS-values than other variables tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2247667     DOI: 10.1016/s0954-6111(08)80073-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  4 in total

1.  Effects of air pollution on changes in lung function induced by exercise in children with chronic respiratory symptoms.

Authors:  K L Timonen; J Pekkanen; P Tiittanen; R O Salonen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Asthma outcomes: pulmonary physiology.

Authors:  Robert S Tepper; Robert S Wise; Ronina Covar; Charles G Irvin; Carolyn M Kercsmar; Monica Kraft; Mark C Liu; George T O'Connor; Stephen P Peters; Ronald Sorkness; Alkis Togias
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Measuring the bronchial effect of bronchodilating drugs in healthy subjects after methacholine provocation. Salbutamol as a model drug.

Authors:  O P Seppälä; E Iisalo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Graphic analysis of flow-volume curves: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jungsil Lee; Choon-Taek Lee; Jae Ho Lee; Young-Jae Cho; Jong Sun Park; Yeon-Mok Oh; Sang-Do Lee; Ho Il Yoon
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.317

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.