Literature DB >> 22476632

A novel "pelvic ring augmentation construct" for lumbo-pelvic reconstruction in tumour surgery.

Sathya Thambiraj1, Daren P Forward, James Thomas, Bronek M Boszczyk.   

Abstract

AIM: Reconstructing or augmenting the lumbo-pelvic junction after resection of L5 and part of the sacrum is challenging. Numerous lumbo-pelvic reconstruction methods based on posterior construct and anterior cages have been proposed for cases involving total sacrectomy and lumbar vertebrectomy. These constructs create long lever arms and generate high cantilever forces across the lumbo-sacral junction, resulting in implant failure or breakage. Biomechanical studies have shown that placing implants anterior to lumbo-sacral pivot point provides a more effective moment arm to resist flexion force and improves the ultimate strength of the construct. We present here a novel method to augment a lumbo-pelvic construction using a pelvic ring construct.
METHODS: A 69-year-old lady presented with implant failure of her two previous posterior lumbo-pelvic reconstructions performed by the authors. She initially presented, two and a half years previously with 6 months history of back pain with normal neurological function. MRI scans of her whole spine showed isolated secondaries in the lumbar spine (L4, L5) and sacrum (S1). An abdominal CT scan revealed a primary tumour in her right kidney. Briefly, the first surgery involved a single-stage removal of posterior elements of L4 and L5 and posterior stabilisation from L2 to pelvis, anterior resection of L4 and L5 and partially S1 with implantation of an expandable Synex II cage. The cage was replaced with an anterior rod construct from L2 and L3 to a trans-sacral screw a week later as it had dislodged. The second revision, 9 months later, involved removal of two posterior broken rods which were replaced and converted into a modified four-rod construct. While monitoring her progress, it was subsequently noted that the trans-sacral rod had broken. Therefore, it was decided to augment her lumbo-pelvic construct to prevent eventual catastrophic posterior construct failure. From a posterior approach, contoured rods were passed bilaterally along the inner table of the pelvis under the iliacus muscle up to the anterior border of the pelvis. Using T-connectors, the rods were connected to the posterior lumbo-pelvic construct. Thereafter, two anterior supra-acetabular pelvic screws were connected to a subcutaneously placed rod matched to the shape of the anterior abdominal wall. The pelvic ring construct was completed on connecting this rod with T-connectors to the free ends of the contoured iliac rods. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: There were no intra-operative complications. At the end of 12 months, she was mobilising with a frame, with no radiological evidence of failure of the construct. However, she died due to disease progression at the end of 15 months. Experience from one clinical case shows that such a construct is feasible and adds a technical option to the difficult reconstruction of lumbo-pelvic junction after tumour surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22476632      PMCID: PMC3459110          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2243-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

1.  Reconstruction after total sacrectomy using a new instrumentation technique: a biomechanical comparison.

Authors:  Norio Kawahara; Hideki Murakami; Akira Yoshida; Jiro Sakamoto; Juhachi Oda; Katsuro Tomita
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Pelvic strength after major amputation of the sacrum. An exerimental study.

Authors:  B Gunterberg; B Romanus; B Stener
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1976-12

3.  Lumbopelvic reconstruction after combined L5 spondylectomy and total sacrectomy for en bloc resection of a malignant fibrous histiocytoma.

Authors:  Gary L Gallia; Ian Suk; Timothy F Witham; Susan L Gearhart; James H Black; Richard J Redett; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 4.  Total sacrectomy and Galveston L-rod reconstruction for malignant neoplasms. Technical note.

Authors:  Z L Gokaslan; M M Romsdahl; S S Kroll; G L Walsh; T A Gillis; D M Wildrick; M E Leavens
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Technique and results of fixation to the sacrum with iliosacral screws.

Authors:  J P Farcy; B A Rawlins; S D Glassman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The iliac buttress. A computed tomographic study of sacral anatomy.

Authors:  R P Jackson; A C McManus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Total en bloc spondylectomy for solitary spinal metastases.

Authors:  K Tomita; N Kawahara; H Baba; H Tsuchiya; S Nagata; Y Toribatake
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy for osteosarcoma using a custom-made prosthesis: a technical note.

Authors:  P Wuisman; O Lieshout; M van Dijk; P van Diest
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Biomechanical analysis of lumbosacral fixation.

Authors:  D H McCord; B W Cunningham; Y Shono; J J Myers; P C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Anatomic and radiographic considerations for placement of transiliac screws in lumbopelvic fixations.

Authors:  Thomas A Schildhauer; Patrick McCulloch; Jens R Chapman; Frederick A Mann
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2002-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "a novel 'pelvic ring augmentation construct' for lumbo-pelvic reconstruction in tumor surgery" (by Sathya Thambiraj, Daren Forward, James Thomas and Bronek Boszczyk).

Authors:  Rahul Vaidya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of the risk of breakage of two kinds of sacroiliac screws in the treatment of bilateral sacral fractures.

Authors:  Shengqiang Fu; Yong Zhao; Wei Lian; Dexin Zou; Tao Sun; Yuchi Zhao; Jiangwei Tan; Shudong Zhang; Dan Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.