Literature DB >> 22476341

[Refracture of long bones after implant removal. An avoidable complication?].

B G Ochs1, C E Gonser, H C Baron, U Stöckle, A Badke, F M Stuby.   

Abstract

Refractures of long bones after implant removal are a rare but serious complication, which in most cases make a reoperation necessary. We analysed our own cases and reviewed the scarce literature on this subject. As a result we found that it is possible to reduce this complication by performing thorough preoperative preparation, observing an adequate interim time between initial osteosynthesis and hardware removal, cautiously exposing the weakened bone to force for a certain time period after implant removal and taking the character of the fracture healing into consideration. It is not possible to entirely eradicate this complication because a lot of patients demand the implant removal even though it is known that demineralisation and residual screw holes both induce a reduction of energy-absorbing capacity and therefore predispose the patient to refracture. In some cases the surgeon should recommend that the implants remain in situ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22476341     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-012-2155-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  23 in total

Review 1.  Hardware removal: indications and expectations.

Authors:  Matthew L Busam; Robert J Esther; William T Obremskey
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Refracture of bones of the forearm after the removal of compression plates.

Authors:  G Schweitzer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Comminuted refracture of the distal femur and condyles in patients with an intramedullary nail: a report of 5 cases.

Authors:  R K Sen; A Gul; S Aggarwal; S R Kumar; O N Nagi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.118

4.  Evaluation of risk for secondary fracture after removal of a new femoral neck plate for intracapsular hip fractures.

Authors:  Sebastian Eberle; Christof Wutte; Christoph Bauer; Geert von Oldenburg; Stephanie Panzer; Peter Augat
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Removal of a bent nail after refracture of the femoral shaft.

Authors:  Jin Park; Kyu Hyun Yang
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  [Problems of implant removal].

Authors:  G Küntscher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Bone weakness after the removal of plates and screws. Cortical atrophy or screw holes?

Authors:  J Rosson; J Egan; J Shearer; P Monro
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-03

8.  Refracture of bones of the forearm after the removal of compression plates.

Authors:  P A Deluca; R W Lindsey; P A Ruwe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Complications of forearm-plate removal.

Authors:  D A Bednar; W Grandwilewski
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Bone structure after removal of internal fixation plates.

Authors:  J W Rosson; G W Petley; J R Shearer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-01
View more
  9 in total

1.  Complications during removal of conventional versus locked compression plates: is there a difference?

Authors:  Hanjo Neumann; Anne Stadler; Hinrich Heuer; Marc Auerswald; Justus Gille; Arndt Peter Schulz; Benjamin Kienast
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Fractures of the lower extremities in childhood : Part 1: fractures of the thigh and in the proximity of the knee].

Authors:  L Kremer; M Voth; I Marzi
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Technical complications during removal of locking screws from locking compression plates: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  N Schwarz; S Euler; M Schlittler; T Ulbing; P Wilhelm; G Fronhöfer; M Irnstorfer
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  A novel implant removal technique by endoscopy.

Authors:  Chang Heng Liu; Wen Lin Yeh; Ping Jui Tsai; Kuo Feng Fan; Hung Wei Cheng; Jian Ming Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 5.  Current State of Bone Adhesives-Necessities and Hurdles.

Authors:  Kai O Böker; Katharina Richter; Katharina Jäckle; Shahed Taheri; Ingo Grunwald; Kai Borcherding; Janek von Byern; Andreas Hartwig; Britt Wildemann; Arndt F Schilling; Wolfgang Lehmann
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  The Application of an Allogenic Bone Screw for Stabilization of a Modified Chevron Osteotomy: A Prospective Analysis.

Authors:  Thorsten Huber; Stefan G Hofstätter; Rainer Fiala; Florian Hartenbach; Robert Breuer; Björn Rath
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Metal implant removal: benefits and drawbacks--a patient survey.

Authors:  Georg Reith; Vera Schmitz-Greven; Kai O Hensel; Marco M Schneider; Tibor Tinschmann; Bertil Bouillon; Christian Probst
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Numerical simulation of callus healing for optimization of fracture fixation stiffness.

Authors:  Malte Steiner; Lutz Claes; Anita Ignatius; Ulrich Simon; Tim Wehner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Impact of Psychological Factors on Device Removal Surgery.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Golbakhsh; Mirmostafa Sadaat; Fatemeh Noughani; Ahmadreza Mirbolook; Amirmohammad Gholizadeh; Sadegh Abedi
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2016-05-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.