| Literature DB >> 22476075 |
Vigya Kesari1, Vinod Madurai Sathyanarayana, Ajay Parida, Latha Rangan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pongamia pinnata, a legume tree, has many traditional uses and is a potential biodiesel plant. Despite its importance and the availability of appropriate molecular genetic tools, the full potential of Pongamia is yet to be realized. The objective of this study was to assess genetic diversity among 10 systematically characterized candidate plus trees (CPTs) of P. pinnata from North Guwahati.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 22476075 PMCID: PMC2997655 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plq017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Degree of polymorphism and PIC for RAPD and ISSR primers in 10 CPTs of P. pinnata
| Markers | Primer code | Total number of bands | Number of polymorphic bands | POL (%) | PIC | MI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAPD | OPC 07 | 14 | 3 | 21.43 | 0.42 | 9.00 |
| OPL 11 | 11 | 1 | 9.09 | 0.32 | 2.91 | |
| OPO 08 | 13 (M) | 0 | – | – | – | |
| OPAH 15 | 9 | 2 | 22.22 | 0.42 | 9.33 | |
| OPAM 20 | 3 (M) | 0 | – | – | – | |
| OPAN 01 | 19 | 3 | 15.79 | 0.46 | 7.26 | |
| OPAO 01 | 13 | 3 | 23.08 | 0.49 | 11.38 | |
| OPAP 20 | 8 | 2 | 25.00 | 0.33 | 8.25 | |
| OPAN 05 | 8 (M) | 0 | – | – | – | |
| OPAP 10 | 15 | 1 | 6.67 | 0.48 | 3.20 | |
| OPAA 01 | 8 (M) | 0 | – | – | – | |
| OPAB 01 | 13 | 2 | 15.38 | 0.45 | 6.92 | |
| OPAB 05 | 5 (M) | 0 | – | – | – | |
| OPAB 14 | 13 | 2 | 15.38 | 0.45 | 6.92 | |
| OPAH 13 | 14 | 3 | 21.43 | 0.45 | 9.58 | |
| OPAF 02 | 5 (M) | 0 | – | – | – | |
| OPAJ 19 | 18 (M) | 0 | – | – | – | |
| OPX 20 | 21 (M) | 0 | – | – | – | |
| Total | 210 | 22 | 10.48 | – | – | |
| Mean | 11.67 | 2.2 | – | – | – | |
| ISSR | HB13 | 12 | 2 | 16.67 | 0.49 | 8.17 |
| HB14 | 8 (M) | 0 | – | – | – | |
| HB15 | 8 (M) | 0 | – | – | – | |
| P8 | 9 (M) | 0 | – | – | – | |
| 824 | 6 (M) | 0 | – | – | – | |
| 825 | 12 | 3 | 25.00 | 0.49 | 12.33 | |
| 826 | 8 | 2 | 25.00 | 0.25 | 6.25 | |
| P6 | 10 (M) | 0 | – | – | – | |
| 809 | 10 (M) | 0 | – | – | – | |
| 818 | 16 | 2 | 12.50 | 0.18 | 2.25 | |
| HB12 | 17 | 3 | 17.65 | 0.41 | 7.29 | |
| (CAG)5 | 13 | 1 | 7.69 | 0.50 | 3.85 | |
| Total | 129 | 13 | 10.08 | – | – | |
| Mean | 10.75 | 2.17 | – | – | – |
POL, polymorphism; M, monomorphic marker; PIC, average polymorphic information content for polymorphic bands; MI, marker index = POL (%) × PIC.
Fig. 1RAPD and ISSR polymorphic profiles for 10 CPTs of Lane M, 1 kb DNA ladder; lanes 1–5, NGPP 26–NGPP 30; lanes 6–10, NGPP 46–NGPP 50. (A) RAPD (OPAH 13); (B) ISSR (825).
Degree of polymorphism and PIC for AFLP primers applied to 10 CPTs of P. pinnata
| Primer combinations | Total number of bands | POL | PIC | MI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | % | ||||
| 50 | 50 | 100 | 0.34 | 34 | |
| 26 | 26 | 100 | 0.26 | 26 | |
| 49 | 49 | 100 | 0.30 | 30 | |
| 124 | 124 | 100 | 0.33 | 33 | |
POL, polymorphism; PIC, average polymorphic information content for polymorphic bands;
MI, marker index = POL (%) × PIC.
Mean genetic data of two populations having a total of 10 CPTs of P. pinnata
| Markers | Populations | POL (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAPD | POP 6 | 1.087 ± 0.283 | 1.068 ± 0.228 | 0.038 ± 0.124 | 0.054 ± 0.177 | 18 | 8.7 |
| POP 10 | 1.039 ± 0.193 | 1.016 ± 0.092 | 0.010 ± 0.056 | 0.017 ± 0.087 | 8 | 3.86 | |
| Mean | 1.063 ± 0.238 | 1.042 ± 0.160 | 0.024 ± 0.090 | 0.035 ± 0.132 | 13 | 6.28 | |
| At species level | 1.105 ± 0.307 | 1.064 ± 0.206 | 0.038 ± 0.116 | 0.057 ± 0.171 | 22 | 10.63 | |
| ISSR | POP 6 | 1.054 ± 0.227 | 1.046 ± 0.188 | 0.024 ± 0.101 | 0.034 ± 0.144 | 7 | 5.43 |
| POP 10 | 1.054 ± 0.227 | 1.040 ± 0.178 | 0.022 ± 0.096 | 0.032 ± 0.137 | 7 | 5.43 | |
| Mean | 1.054 ± 0.227 | 1.042 ± 0.183 | 0.023 ± 0.098 | 0.033 ± 0.141 | 7 | 5.43 | |
| At species level | 1.101 ± 0.302 | 1.076 ± 0.241 | 0.042 ± 0.129 | 0.061 ± 0.185 | 13 | 10.08 | |
| AFLP | POP 6 | 1.807 ± 0.395 | 1.399 ± 0.325 | 0.248 ± 0.165 | 0.385 ± 0.229 | 201 | 80.72 |
| POP 10 | 1.683 ± 0.466 | 1.340 ± 0.334 | 0.210 ± 0.177 | 0.326 ± 0.253 | 170 | 68.27 | |
| Mean | 1.745 ± 0.431 | 1.370 ± 0.330 | 0.229 ± 0.171 | 0.356 ± 0.241 | 186 | 74.50 | |
| At species level | 1.992 ± 0.089 | 1.389 ± 0.308 | 0.247 ± 0.149 | 0.395 ± 0.183 | 249 | 100 |
na, observed number of alleles; ne, effective number of alleles; h, Nei's (1973) gene diversity; I, Shannon's information index; P, number of polymorphic bands; POL (%), percentage polymorphism.
Genetic population structure and estimate of gene flow within the populations of CPT of P. pinnata
| RAPD | 0.038 ± 0.0137 | 0.024 ± 0.0066 | 0.377 | 0.828 |
| ISSR | 0.042 ± 0.0166 | 0.023 ± 0.0070 | 0.452 | 0.607 |
| AFLP | 0.247 ± 0.0222 | 0.229 ± 0.0202 | 0.074 | 6.287 |
Hsp, total variability; Hpop, variability within population; Gst, inter-population differentiation; Nm, estimate of gene flow from Gst (Slatkin and Barton 1989). Nm = 0.5(1 − Gst)/Gst (McDermott and McDonald 1993).
Fig. 2Dendrograms representing the genetic variability among 10 CPTs of The genetic distances were from the Dice similarity coefficient. (A) RAPD; (B) ISSR; (C) AFLP.