Literature DB >> 22475219

Multi-criteria decision analyses. Viewing MCDA in terms of both process and aggregation methods: some thoughts, motivated by the paper of Huang, Keisler and Linkov.

Rainer Bruggemann1, Lars Carlsen.   

Abstract

The paper of Huang, Keisler and Linkov (HKL) (Huang et al., 2011) has motivated us to this note about the relation between ranking procedures and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) tools. The key concept in the HKL-paper is in our eyes the 'trade-off'. A 'trade-off' seems necessary, when conflicting indicator values are present. HKL stress that the general application of MCDA is hampered by different terminology. We do not claim to have a solution for that problem. Nevertheless, we think that the discussion is worthwhile and this note presents some of our ideas, which basically imply the need of a broadening of the definition of MCDA.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22475219     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  1 in total

1.  A Measure to Target Antipoverty Policies in the European Union Regions.

Authors:  Paola Annoni; Dorota Weziak-Bialowolska
Journal:  Appl Res Qual Life       Date:  2014-09-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.