| Literature DB >> 22475187 |
Xiang-Sheng Chen1, Qian-Qiu Wang, Yue-Ping Yin, Guo-Jun Liang, Ning Jiang, Li-Gang Yang, Qiao Liu, Yu-Jiao Zhou, Xi-Ping Huan, Wan-Hui Wei, Baoxi Wang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Syphilis has made a dramatic resurgence in China during the past two decades and become the third most prevalent notifiable infectious disease in China. Female sex workers (FSWs) have become one of key populations for the epidemic. In order to investigate syphilis infection among different tiers of FSWs, a cross-sectional study was conducted in 8 sites in China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22475187 PMCID: PMC3352076 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-84
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Prevalence of syphilis by demographic and behavioral characteristics and HIV infection (univariate analysis)
| Characteristics | Number* | Prevalence | OR (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 7118 | 5.0 (4.5-5.5) | ||
| Age in years (median, interquartile range) | 24 (16-56) | < 0.001 | 1.08 (1.07, 1.10) | |
| Age group | < 0.001 | |||
| 16-19 | 1015 | 1.7 (1.0, 2.5) | 1.0 (Reference) | |
| 20-29 | 4197 | 4.0 (3.0, 4.6) | 2.42 (1.46, 4.00) | |
| 30-39 | 1519 | 7.8 (6.0, 9.2) | 4.98 (2.97, 8.33) | |
| 40- | 387 | 14.4 (11.0, 18.0) | 9.85 (5.63, 17.23) | |
| Province | < 0.001 | |||
| Jiangsu | 1791 | 3.6 (2.8-4.5) | 1.0 (Reference) | |
| Guangdong | 1361 | 4.0 (2.9-5.0) | 1.10 (0.76, 1.59) | |
| Guangxi | 2515 | 7.1 (6.1-8.1) | 2.03 (1.52, 2.72) | |
| Hainan | 1451 | 3.9 (2.9-4.9) | 1.10 (0.77, 1.59) | |
| Site city | < 0.001 | |||
| Yangzhou | 929 | 0.8 (0.2-1.3) | 1.0 (Reference) | |
| Changzhou | 862 | 6.7 (5.1-8.4) | 9.49 (4.31, 20.92) | |
| Jiangmen | 533 | 3.0 (1.6-4.6) | 4.07 (1.66, 9.95) | |
| Maoming | 828 | 4.6 (3.2-6.0) | 6.39 (2.84, 14.38) | |
| Wuzhou | 1706 | 4.7 (3.7-5.7) | 6.49 (2.99, 14.11) | |
| Hezhou | 809 | 12.2 (10.0-14.5) | 18.33 (8.46, 39.69) | |
| Qionghai | 643 | 4.4 (2.8-5.9) | 6.25 (2.71, 14.40) | |
| Sanya | 808 | 3.6 (2.3-4.9) | 4.89 (2.13, 11.23) | |
| Education | < 0.001 | |||
| Primary or less | 1140 | 9.4 (7.7-11.1) | 4.42 (2.91, 6.72) | |
| Junior high school | 4727 | 4.6 (4.0-5.2) | 2.04 (1.38, 3.02) | |
| Senior high school and above | 1243 | 2.3 (1.5-3.2) | 1.0 (Reference) | |
| Marital status | < 0.001 | |||
| Never married | 4262 | 3.5 (3.0-4.1) | 1.0 (Reference) | |
| Married | 2641 | 7.0 (6.0-8.0) | 2.08 (1.67, 2.59) | |
| Separated/divorced/widowed | 202 | 9.9 (5.8-14.0) | 3.03 (1.86,4.95) | |
| Ethnicity | 0.452 | |||
| Han | 6263 | 5.0 (4.5-5.5) | 1.0 (Reference) | |
| Minority | 827 | 5.6 (4.0-7.2) | 1.13(0.82, 1.55) | |
| Household registration(hukou) | 0.322 | |||
| Local | 1859 | 4.6 (3.7-5.6) | 1.0 (Reference) | |
| Not local | 5246 | 5.2 (4.6-5.8) | 1.13(0.88, 1.46) | |
| Typology | < 0.001 | |||
| High-tier | 2144 | 2.2 (1.6-2.9) | 1.0 (Reference) | |
| Middle-tier | 3227 | 4.3 (3.6-5.0) | 1.95 (1.40, 2.73) | |
| Low-tier | 1747 | 9.7 (8.3-11.1) | 4.76 (3.43, 6.60) | |
| Having had any STI symptoms past year | 0.658 | |||
| Yes | 2892 | 4.9 (4.1-5.7) | 0.95 (0.77, 1.18) | |
| No | 4200 | 5.1 (4.4-5.8) | 1.0 (Reference) | |
| Consistent condom use in past month | 0.254 | |||
| Yes | 3282 | 5.4 (4.7-6.2) | 1.14 (0.91,1.42) | |
| No | 3266 | 4.8 (4.0-5.5) | 1.0 (Reference) | |
| Injecting drug use | < 0.001 | |||
| Yes | 20 | 25.0 (6.0-44.0) | 6.39 (2.31, 17.69) | |
| No | 7063 | 4.9 (4.4-5.4) | 1.0 (Reference) | |
| HIV infection | 0.007 | |||
| Positive | 43 | 14.0 (3.6-24.3) | 3.11 (1.30, 7.41) | |
| Negative | 7059 | 4.9 (4.4-5.5) | 1.0 (Reference) |
*The sum of numbers in some subgroups was less than 7118 because some participants did not respond to some questions.
CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio.
Multivariate analysis of factors associated with syphilis infection
| Factor | Adjusted OR (95%CI) | P |
|---|---|---|
| Age group in years | ||
| 16-19 | 1.0 (Reference) | - |
| 20-29 | 2.62 (1.57, 4.36) | < 0.001 |
| 30-39 | 4.37 (2.57, 7.42) | < 0.001 |
| 40- | 7.81 (4.36, 14.01) | < 0.001 |
| Site city | ||
| Yangzhou | 1.0 (Reference) | - |
| Changzhou | 14.35 (6.43, 32.03) | < 0.001 |
| Jiangmen | 9.51 (3.76, 24.08) | < 0.001 |
| Maoming | 10.62 (4.61, 24.47) | < 0.001 |
| Wuzhou | 4.17 (1.90, 9.17) | < 0.001 |
| Hezhou | 13.54 (6.17, 29.71) | < 0.001 |
| Qionghai | 9.44 (4.00, 22.29) | < 0.001 |
| Sanya | 8.14 (3.48, 19.02) | < 0.001 |
| Education | ||
| Primary or less | 2.10 (1.34, 3.30) | 0.001 |
| Junior high school | 1.56 (1.04, 2.35) | 0.031 |
| Senior high school and above | 1.0 (Reference) | - |
| Typology | ||
| High-tier | 1.0 (Reference) | - |
| Middle-tier | 1.68 (1.15, 2.46) | 0.008 |
| Low-tier | 4.05 (2.60, 6.31) | < 0.001 |
| Injecting drug use | ||
| Yes | 6.17 (2.13, 17.81) | 0.001 |
| No | 1.0 (Reference) | - |
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval.
Multivariate analysis of factors associated with low FSW typology
| Factor | Low vs. middle/high tiers | |
|---|---|---|
| Age group in years | ||
| 16-19 | 1.00 (Reference) | -- |
| 20-29 | 0.71 (0.59, 0.86) | < 0.001 |
| 30-39 | 1.26 (0.99, 1.61) | 0.06 |
| 40- | 1.81 (1.33, 2.46) | < 0.001 |
| Education | ||
| Primary or less | 6.45 (5.10, 8.15) | < 0.001 |
| Junior high school | 2.54 (2.06, 3.13) | < 0.001 |
| Senior high school and above | 1.0 (Reference) | -- |
| Marital status | ||
| Never married | 1.0 (Reference) | -- |
| Married | 1.86 (1.58, 2.18) | < 0.001 |
| Separated/divorced/widowed | 2.15 (1.54, 3.01) | < 0.001 |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Han | 1.0 (Reference) | -- |
| Minority | 1.29 (1.08, 1.55) | 0.005 |
| Household registration ( | ||
| Local resident | 2.11 (1.86, 2.40) | < 0.001 |
| Not local resident | 1.0 (Reference) | -- |
AOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval.