Literature DB >> 22475155

Recruitment using mobile telephones in an Irish general population sexual health survey: challenges and practical solutions.

Orla McBride1, Karen Morgan, Hannah McGee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-coverage of households without a landline telephone is a major concern of telephone survey researchers. Sampling mobile telephone users in national surveys is vital in order to gain access to the growing proportion of households that use mobile telephones extensively or exclusively. The complex logistics of conducting surveys with mobile telephones have been discussed in the literature. This paper outlines the actual challenges encountered during a recent national sexual health survey in Ireland, which utilized a mobile telephone sampling frame to recruit approximately half of the sample.
METHOD: The 2010 Irish Contraception and Crisis Pregnancy Survey (ICCP-2010) is a nationally representative sample of adults aged 18-45 years living in Ireland (n = 3002; 1416 recruited by landline telephone and 1586 recruited by mobile telephone). The overall response rate for the survey was 69% (79% for the landline telephone strand; 61% for the mobile telephone strand). All interviews were conducted using computer-assisting telephone interviewing.
RESULTS: During the 18-week fieldwork period, five main challenges relating to the use of mobile telephones were encountered: (1) explaining to respondents how random digit dialling works in relation to mobile telephones; (2) establishing the respondent's eligibility; (3) calling the respondent with the Caller ID blocked or withheld; (4) calling the respondent when they are in any number of locations or situations; and (5) explaining to respondents the importance of refusal conversion calls for the response rate calculation. Details of how the survey protocols and procedures were monitored and adapted throughout the study to ensure a high response rate are outlined.
CONCLUSION: It is undeniably more challenging to recruit respondents using mobile telephones as opposed to landline telephones. Respondents are generally not familiar with being contacted on their personal mobile telephone for the purposes of being recruited for a research study. The main challenge for survey methodologists and interviewers is to devise simple protocols to explain to respondents why they are being contacted on a mobile telephone. Recommendations for survey researchers interested in using this methodological approach in the future are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22475155      PMCID: PMC3347989          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol        ISSN: 1471-2288            Impact factor:   4.615


  9 in total

1.  Growing cell-phone population and noncoverage bias in traditional random digit dial telephone health surveys.

Authors:  Sunghee Lee; J Michael Brick; E Richard Brown; David Grant
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Feasibility of including cellular telephone numbers in random digit dialing for epidemiologic case-control studies.

Authors:  Lynda F Voigt; Stephen M Schwartz; David R Doody; Spencer C Lee; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution.

Authors:  Stephen J Blumberg; Julian V Luke; Marcie L Cynamon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  New challenges for telephone survey research in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Angela M Kempf; Patrick L Remington
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  Reevaluating the need for concern regarding noncoverage bias in landline surveys.

Authors:  Stephen J Blumberg; Julian V Luke
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Telephone surveys in public health research.

Authors:  A C Marcus; L A Crane
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008.

Authors:  Eleonora Dal Grande; Anne W Taylor
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Is web interviewing a good alternative to telephone interviewing? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands survey.

Authors:  Gera E Nagelhout; Marc C Willemsen; Mary E Thompson; Geoffrey T Fong; Bas van den Putte; Hein de Vries
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Emerging advantages and drawbacks of telephone surveying in public health research in Ireland and the U.K.

Authors:  M Boland; M R Sweeney; E Scallan; M Harrington; A Staines
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Improving gambling survey research using dual-frame sampling of landline and mobile phone numbers.

Authors:  Alun C Jackson; Darren Pennay; Nicki A Dowling; Bernadette Coles-Janess; Darren R Christensen
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2014-06

2.  Experiences of crisis pregnancy among Irish and non-Irish adults living in Ireland: findings from the Irish Contraception and Crisis Pregnancy Survey 2010 (ICCP-2010).

Authors:  K Yogalingam; C Kelleher; A Bourke; D Boduszek; H McGee; K Morgan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Prescription contraception use: a cross-sectional population study of psychosocial determinants.

Authors:  Gerard J Molloy; Leigh-Ann Sweeney; Molly Byrne; Carmel M Hughes; Roger Ingham; Karen Morgan; Andrew W Murphy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Potential use of telephone surveys for non-communicable disease surveillance in developing countries: evidence from a national household survey in Lebanon.

Authors:  Abla M Sibai; Lilian A Ghandour; Rawan Chaaban; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Moving on From Representativeness: Testing the Utility of the Global Drug Survey.

Authors:  Monica J Barratt; Jason A Ferris; Renee Zahnow; Joseph J Palamar; Larissa J Maier; Adam R Winstock
Journal:  Subst Abuse       Date:  2017-06-30

6.  National estimates of Australian gambling prevalence: f indings from a dual-frame omnibus survey.

Authors:  N A Dowling; G J Youssef; A C Jackson; D W Pennay; K L Francis; A Pennay; D I Lubman
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 6.526

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.