| Literature DB >> 22474507 |
Shu Sun1, Hong Xu, Lawrence Ngeh.
Abstract
The clinical efficacy of the Chinese therapeutic food (specifically hawthorn fruit and Chinese kiwifruit-extract compound) on dyslipidemia was evaluated in this placebo-controlled, double blind, paired clinical trial conducted in Melbourne, Australia. Forty-three participants diagnosed with moderate dyslipidemia and met the study criteria were randomly assigned to Group A or B, with baseline characteristics matched. Twenty-seven participants completed all the tests, the blood lipid profile including total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), and triglycerides (TG) was analysed. The traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis was made based on participants' symptoms and signs. The results indicate that a four-week intake of the compound increased the serum HDL-c levels by 5% (P = 0.026) and decreased the ratios of TC/HDL-c and LDL-c/HDL-c (P = 0.012 and P = 0.044, resp.). The placebo intake did not significantly change the blood lipid profile. In the initial 43 participants with dyslipidemia, 76.7% of them were diagnosed with "Spleen deficiency" and 58.1% with "Liver qi stagnation." The intake of hawthorn fruit and Chinese kiwifruit extract compound may increase the serum levels of HDL-c and decrease the ratios of TC/HDL-c and LDL-c/HDL-c, therefore, may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22474507 PMCID: PMC3312194 DOI: 10.1155/2012/508683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Participants' general information.
| #Group (No) | Age* | Male | Female | LDL-c* | Systolic blood pressure*(mmHg) Mean ± SD | Diastolic blood pressure* (mmHg) Mean ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A ( | 56.00 ± 7.09 | 5 | 9 | 4.01 ± 0.60 | 125.1 ± 13.4 | 77.9 ± 7.5 |
| B ( | 53.62 ± 9.85 | 8 | 5 | 3.95 ± 0.61 | 125.8 ± 10.0 | 79.9 ± 7.3 |
#A: Group A—took HFC (treatment) for the first four weeks; then took the placebo for the second four weeks; B: Group B—took the placebo for the first four weeks; then took the HFC for the second four weeks.
*P > 0.05.
Figure 1Flow chart of participants through each stage of the trial.
Comparison of HDL-c levels (mmol/L) between pre- and post-HFC treatment.
| Group (no) | Pretreatment* | Posttreatment** |
|---|---|---|
| A ( | 1.44 ± 0.33 | 1.53 ± 0.42# |
| B ( | 1.50 ± 0.42 | 1.54 ± 0.48 |
| A + B ( | 1.47 ± 0.37 | 1.54 ± 0.44## |
# P = 0.09; ## P = 0.026.
*Pretreatment: Group A—pre-HFC treatment; Group B—completed the first four weeks of the placebo intake and is to start HFC treatment, that is Postplacebo value.
**Posttreatment: Group A completed HFC treatment for the first four weeks, that is Preplacebo value; Group B completed the HFC treatment for the second four weeks.
Comparison of HDL-c levels (mmol/L) between pre- and postplacebo intake.
| Group (no) | Preplacebo intake* | Postplacebo intake** |
|---|---|---|
| A ( | 1.55 ± 0.39*** | 1.53 ± 0.34 |
| B ( | 1.58 ± 0.44 | 1.50 ± 0.42 |
P > 0.05.
*Preplacebo intake: Group A completed HFC treatment for the first four weeks and started the placebo intake.
**Postplacebo intake: Group A completed the placebo intake for the second four weeks; Group B completed the placebo intake for the first four weeks.
***This value is different from the value of Group A (n = 14) at posttreatment (1.53 ± 0.42, Table 2) because three participants withdrew from the trial. Eleven participants in Group A (n = 11) completed their test.
Comparison of TC and TG levels (mmol/L) between pre- and post-HFC treatment.
| Group (No) | TC Pretreatment* | TC Posttreatment** | TG Pretreatment* | TG Posttreatment** |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A ( | 6.23 ± 0.63 | 6.34 ± 0.57 | 1.69 ± 0.79 | 1.76 ± 0.89 |
| B ( | 6.41 ± 0.60 | 6.28 ± 0.70 | 1.74 ± 0.83 | 1.55 ± 0.71 |
| A + B ( | 6.31 ± 0.61 | 6.31 ± 0.62 | 1.71 ± 0.79 | 1.66 ± 0.80 |
P > 0.05.
*Pretreatment: Group A—pre-HFC treatment; Group B—completed the first four weeks of the placebo intake.
**Posttreatment: Group A completed HFC treatment for the first four weeks; Group B completed HFC treatment for the second four weeks.
Comparison of TC and TG levels (mmol/L) between pre- and postplacebo intake.
| Group (No) | TC Preplacebo intake* | TC Postplacebo intake** | TG Preplacebo intake* | TG Postplacebo intake** |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A ( | 6.40 ± 0.60 | 6.57 ± 0.65 | 1.54 ± 0.59 | 1.59 ± 0.73 |
| B ( | 6.35 ± 0.65 | 6.41 ± 0.60 | 1.83 ± 1.00 | 1.74 ± 0.83 |
P > 0.05.
*Preplacebo intake: Group A completed HFC treatment for the first four weeks and started the placebo intake.
**Postplacebo intake: Group A completed the placebo intake for the second four weeks; Group B completed the placebo intake for the first four weeks.
Comparison of the TC/HDL-c ratio between pre- and post-HFC treatment.
| Group (No) | Pretreatment* | Posttreatment** |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
| A ( | 4.54 ± 1.12 | 4.41 ± 1.13 |
| B ( | 4.58 ± 1.26 | 4.37 ± 1.20# |
| A + B ( | 4.56 ± 1.17 | 4.39 ± 1.14## |
# P = 0.032; ## P = 0.012.
*Pretreatment: Group A—pre-HFC treatment; Group B—completed the first four weeks of the placebo intake.
**Posttreatment: Group A completed HFC treatment for the first four weeks; Group B completed HFC treatment for the second four weeks.
Comparison of the TC/HDL-c ratio between pre- and postplacebo intake.
| Group (No) | Preplacebo intake* | Postplacebo intake** |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
| A ( | 4.29 ± 0.80 | 4.44 ± 0.93# |
| B ( | 4.31 ± 1.20 | 4.58 ± 1.26## |
# P > 0.05; ## P = 0.047.
*Preplacebo intake: Group A completed HFC treatment for the first four weeks and started the placebo intake.
**Postplacebo intake: Group A completed the placebo intake for the second four weeks; Group B completed the placebo intake for the first four weeks.
Comparison of LDL-c levels (mmol/L) between pre- and post-HFC treatment.
| Group (No) | Pretreatment* | Posttreatment** |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
| A ( | 4.01 ± 0.60 | 4.03 ± 0.43 |
| B ( | 4.10 ± 0.50 | 4.02 ± 0.63 |
| A + B ( | 4.06 ± 0.55 | 4.02 ± 0.53 |
P > 0.05.
*Pretreatment: Group A—pre-HFC treatment; Group B—completed the first four weeks of the placebo intake.
**Posttreatment: Group A completed HFC treatment for the first four weeks; Group B completed HFC treatment for the second four weeks.
Comparison of LDL-c levels (mmol/L) between pre- and postplacebo intake.
| Group (No) | Preplacebo intake* | Postplacebo intake** |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
| A ( | 4.17 ± 0.33 | 4.32 ± 0.50 |
| B ( | 3.95 ± 0.61 | 4.10 ± 0.50 |
P > 0.05.
*Preplacebo intake: Group A completed HFC treatment for the first four weeks and started the placebo intake.
**Postplacebo intake: Group A completed the placebo intake for the second four weeks; Group B completed the placebo intake for the first four weeks.
Comparison of the LDL-c/HDL-c ratio between pre- and post-HFC treatment.
| Group (No) | Pretreatment* | Posttreatment** |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
| A ( | 2.94 ± 0.82 | 2.81 ± 0.71 |
| B ( | 2.94 ± 0.87 | 2.83 ± 0.94# |
| A + B ( | 2.94 ± 0.83 | 2.81 ± 0.82## |
# P = 0.075; ## P = 0.044.
*Pretreatment: Group A—pre-HFC treatment; Group B—completed the first four weeks of the placebo intake.
**Posttreatment: Group A completed HFC treatment for the first four weeks; Group B completed HFC treatment for the second four weeks.
Comparison of the LDL-c/HDL-c ratio between pre- and postplacebo intake.
| Group (No) | Preplacebo intake* | Postplacebo intake** |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
| A ( | 2.80 ± 0.53 | 2.91 ± 0.60# |
| B ( | 2.68 ± 0.80 | 2.94 ± 0.87## |
# P > 0.05; ## P = 0.041.
*Preplacebo intake: Group A completed HFC treatment for the first four weeks and started the placebo intake.
**Postplacebo intake: Group A completed the placebo intake for the second four weeks; Group B completed the placebo intake for the first four weeks.
Changes of the blood lipid profile comparing pre- and post-HFC treatment.
| Blood Lipid | Group A | Group B | Group A + B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total cholesterol (TC) | → | → | → |
| Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) | → | → | → |
| High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) | ↑ | → | ↑ |
| The ratio of TC/HDL-c | → | ↓ | ↓ |
| The ratio of LDL-c/HDL-c | → | → | ↓ |
| Triglycerides (TG) | → | → | → |
Note: ↑ = significant increase.
→ = no significant change.
↓ = significant decrease.
Major TCM patterns of disharmony and clinical manifestations relating to dyslipidemia.
| Patterns | Main clinical manifestations |
|---|---|
|
| Tiredness, preference of warmth, abdominal distension/discomfort, reduced appetite, indigestion, loose stool/diarrhea (or alternately with constipation), pale or swollen tongue with or without teeth marks, weak (and/or slippery) pulse |
|
| |
|
| Stress, depression, irritability, anxiety, migraine/dizziness, abdominal distension, oppression in the chest, irregularity of menstruation, wiry/rough pulse |
|
| |
|
| Tiredness, headache/dizziness, insomnia, lower back pain, knee/leg pain, weak pulse in the cubit |
|
| |
|
| Obesity, dizziness, feeling of heavy head and/or body, fullness in the chest and/or abdomen, nausea, bland taste in the mouth, thirst but without intention to have water, greasy tongue coating, slippery pulse |
|
| |
|
| Dark complexion/lips, encrusted skin, fixed stabbing pain, clots in the menstrual blood with/without irregularity of menstruation, purple tongue, rough/intermittent/bound pulse |
Frequencies of baseline TCM patterns of the 43 participants.
| TCM patterns* | Frequency | Proportion of the total (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 33 | 76.7 |
|
| 25 | 58.1 |
|
| 9 | 20.9 |
|
| 4 | 9.3 |
|
| 16 | 37.2 |
|
| 13 | 30.2 |
| Food stagnation | 6 | 14.0 |
|
| 14 | 32.6 |
|
| 5 | 11.6 |
|
| 15 | 34.9 |
*Manifestations of different TCM patterns may coexist in one individual.
Frequencies of major baseline symptoms of the 43 participants.
| Major symptoms | Frequency | Proportion of the total (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Preference of warmth | 17 | 39.5 |
| Preference of coolness | 9 | 20.9 |
| Night sweating | 5 | 11.6 |
| Thirst/Dry mouth | 22 | 51.2 |
| Poor appetite | 5 | 11.6 |
| Abdominal symptoms | 23 | 53.5 |
| Abdominal distension | 14 | 32.6 |
| Other discomfort | 13 | 30.2 |
| Reflux | 11 | 25.6 |
| Abnormal bowel movement | 20 | 46.5 |
| Loose stool/diarrhea | 10 | 23.3 |
| Constipation | 4 | 9.3 |
| Alternate diarrhea and constipation | 6 | 14.0 |
| Feeling of oppression/occasional pain in the chest | 6 | 14.0 |
| Palpitation | 7 | 16.3 |
| Feeling stressful/anxiety/depression | 24 | 55.8 |
| Sleep disorder | 23 | 53.5 |
| Feeling sleepy | 13 | 30.2 |
| Dizziness/feeling light-headed | 2 | 4.7 |
| Headache | 11 | 25.6 |
| Lower back/leg/knee pain | 16 | 37.2 |
Tongue features of the 43 participants.
| Tongue feature | Frequency | Proportion of the total (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Pink | 6 | 14.0 |
| Pale | 12 | 27.9 |
| Red | 6 | 14.0 |
| Purple | 14 | 32.6 |
| Red tip | 15 | 34.9 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Normal | 13 | 34.9 |
| Swollen | 6 | 14.0 |
| Thin | 22 | 51.2 |
| With teeth marks | 21 | 48.8 |
| Without teeth marks | 22 | 51.2 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Thin | 7 | 16.3 |
| Thick/greasy | 9 | 20.9 |
| Dry | 6 | 14.0 |
| Less than normal | 3 | 7.0 |
| Fissure | 19 | 44.2 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| White | 28 | 65.1 |
| Yellow | 15 | 34.9 |
Pulse features of the 43 participants.
| Pulse feature | Frequency | Proportion of the total (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Normal | 33 | 76.7 |
| Slow | 1 | 2.3 |
| Fast | 6 | 14.0 |
| Uneven | 2 | 4.6 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Slippery | 15 | 34.9 |
| Thin | 15 | 34.9 |
| Soft/weak | 23 | 53.5 |
| Wiry | 22 | 51.2 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Slippery | 18 | 41.9 |
| Thin | 19 | 44.2 |
| Soft/Weak | 25 | 58.1 |
| Wiry | 15 | 34.9 |