| Literature DB >> 22474431 |
Beatriz Cannizzo1, Agustín Luján, Natalia Estrella, Carina Lembo, Montserrat Cruzado, Claudia Castro.
Abstract
High fructose intake induces an insulin resistance state associated with metabolic syndrome (MS). The effect of vascular inflammation in this model is not completely addressed. The aim of this study was to evaluate vascular remodeling, inflammatory and oxidative stress markers, and atheroma development in high-fructose diet-induced insulin resistance of ApoE-deficient mice (ApoE-KO). Mice were fed with either a normal chow or a 10% w/v fructose (HF) in drinking water over a period of 8 weeks. Thereafter, plasma metabolic parameters, vascular remodeling, atheroma lesion size, inflammatory markers, and NAD(P)H oxidase activity in the arteries were determined. HF diet induced a marked increase in plasma glucose, insulin, and triglycerides in ApoE-KO mice, provoked vascular remodeling, enhanced expression of vascular cell-adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and matrix metalloprotease 9 (MMP-9) and enlarged atherosclerotic lesion in aortic and carotid arteries. NAD(P)H oxidase activity was enhanced by fructose intake, and this effect was attenuated by tempol, a superoxide dismutase mimetic, and losartan, an Angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Our study results show that high-fructose-induced insulin resistance promotes a proinflammatory and prooxidant state which accelerates atherosclerotic plaque formation in ApoE-KO mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22474431 PMCID: PMC3310147 DOI: 10.1155/2012/941304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Diabetes Res ISSN: 1687-5214
Average plasma glucose, insulin, and lipid levels in WT and ApoE-KO mice fed with control diet or high fructose diet.
| Glucose (mg/dL) | Insulin(ng/mL) | Cholesterol (mg/dL) | Triglycerides (mg/dL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT-control diet | 161.2 ± 0.6 | nd | 71.41 ± 1.5 | 91 ± 1.2 |
| WT-fructose fed | 142.7 ± 5.4 | nd | 130.35 ± 6.3 | 83.8 ± 0.7 |
| ApoE-control diet | 143.4 ± 25.9 | 0.85 ± 0.03 | 391.6 ± 6.0 | 114.10 ± 3.5 |
| ApoE-fructose fed | 216.2 ± 22.2* | 1.27 ± 0.19* | 382.0 ± 34.5 | 190.2 ± 18.2* |
Values are the mean ± SD (n = 12) P < 0.05 versus WT control diet, *P < 0.001 versus ApoE control diet.
Figure 1Morphometric analysis of the middle layer of aorta (a) and mesenteric arteries (b) from WT and ApoE-KO mice fed regular chow (Control diet) or high fructose diet (HF). ApoE-KO mice display a decreased lumen/media ratio in vessels walls from fructose-fed ApoE-KO mice. Results are expressed as means (n = 8) ± S.E.M **P < 0.001 versus ApoE control in aortic rings; *P < 0.05 versus WT, § P < 0.05 versus ApoE control in mesenteric arteries rings.
Figure 2High fructose intake enhances atheroma development. (a) Representative of whole aorta artery and (b) representative of right carotid artery staining with Oil-red O. Extent of atherosclerosis quantified as percent of plaque area in ApoE-KO mice fed control diet and HF diet. (c) Cross-sections from the aortic sinus were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to quantify the lesion area. Results are expressed as means (n = 8) ± S.E.M *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 versus control diet.
Figure 3Immunofluorescence detection of VCAM-1 expression (green) in aorta and mesenteric arteries of ApoE KO mice fed control diet or fructose-rich diet (HF). Quantification of the fluorescent signal was performed by ImageJ software. Results are expressed as means ± S.E.M *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 versus control diet.
Figure 4Expression of MMP-9 in aorta from ApoE KO and WT mice fed control diet or fructose-rich diet (HF) determined by Western Blot and immunoflorescence detection. Quantification of the fluorescent signal was performed by ImageJ software. Results are expressed as means ± S.E.M *P < 0.05 versus control diet. (MMP-9: red; Actin: green).
Figure 5NAD(P)H oxidase activity (relative light units: RLU/mg dry tissue) in aorta of mice fed with control diet (n = 8) and mice fed with HF diet (n = 8) alone or with Tempol (n = 8) or losartan (n = 8). Results are expressed as means ± S.E.M. P < 0.001 versus control.